🤖 AI Summary
Assessing food carbon footprints remains challenging due to opaque global supply chains, fragmented data, and the methodological complexity of life cycle assessment (LCA). To address this, we propose a knowledge-enhanced AI framework that integrates LCA principles with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to build an interactive, explainable food carbon footprint analysis system. The system accepts arbitrary food items as input and supports multi-turn question-answering, dynamically translating technical emission data into intuitive analogies (e.g., “equivalent to driving X kilometers”). A publicly deployed prototype demonstrates feasibility in real-world environmental decision support. Empirical validation confirms improved interpretability and usability for non-expert stakeholders. However, limitations persist—including incomplete data coverage and ambiguities in system boundary definition. This work establishes a scalable technical pathway for promoting low-carbon food consumption, sustainable production practices, and evidence-informed climate policy.
📝 Abstract
Environmental sustainability, particularly in relation to climate change, is a key concern for consumers, producers, and policymakers. The carbon footprint, based on greenhouse gas emissions, is a standard metric for quantifying the contribution to climate change of activities and is often assessed using life cycle assessment (LCA). However, conducting LCA is complex due to opaque and global supply chains, as well as fragmented data. This paper presents a methodology that combines advances in LCA and publicly available databases with knowledge-augmented AI techniques, including retrieval-augmented generation, to estimate cradle-to-gate carbon footprints of food products. We introduce a chatbot interface that allows users to interactively explore the carbon impact of composite meals and relate the results to familiar activities. A live web demonstration showcases our proof-of-concept system with arbitrary food items and follow-up questions, highlighting both the potential and limitations - such as database uncertainties and AI misinterpretations - of delivering LCA insights in an accessible format.