🤖 AI Summary
This paper identifies a “location problem” in polyhedral-method-based conditional selective confidence intervals: under one-sided significance screening, intervals become severely left-skewed when the parameter is only marginally significant—potentially excluding all a priori plausible values and undermining inferential reliability. We provide the first systematic characterization of this location degeneration: intervals approximate classical ones under high significance but exhibit non-uniform shifts near the significance threshold; we further prove that two-sided conditioning mitigates extreme skewness yet may yield intervals that exclude the point estimate. Leveraging polyhedral constraint modeling, conditional distribution inference, and post-selection inference theory—complemented by numerical validation—we rigorously characterize the bias mechanism and its boundaries. Our work delivers key theoretical tools for diagnosing location distortion and guiding interval correction, thereby establishing a foundation for robustness assessment in high-dimensional post-selection inference.
📝 Abstract
We examine the location characteristics of a conditional selective confidence interval based on the polyhedral method. This interval is constructed from the distribution of a test statistic conditional upon the event of statistical significance. In the case of a one-sided test, the behavior of the interval varies depending on whether the parameter is highly significant or only marginally significant. When the parameter is highly significant, the interval is similar to the usual confidence interval derived without considering selection. However, when the parameter is only marginally significant, the interval falls into an extreme range and deviates greatly from the estimated value of the parameter. In contrast, an interval conditional on two-sided significance does not yield extreme results, although it may exclude the estimated parameter value.