🤖 AI Summary
Prompt optimization lacks a principled understanding of the fitness landscape’s structural properties. Method: This study pioneers semantic embedding–based autocorrelation analysis to systematically characterize the terrain characteristics of prompt engineering for large language models. Empirically, we analyze 2,024 prompt samples across error detection tasks, comparing two generation strategies—systematic enumeration and novelty-driven diversification. Contribution/Results: We identify two canonical landscape types: smooth-decaying and non-monotonic oscillatory. Moreover, ruggedness varies significantly across error types, revealing strong task dependency in prompt optimization landscapes. These findings provide the first empirically grounded topological characterization of prompt search spaces—offering foundational insights into search difficulty and informing the design of efficient, task-aware optimization algorithms.
📝 Abstract
While prompt engineering has emerged as a crucial technique for optimizing large language model performance, the underlying optimization landscape remains poorly understood. Current approaches treat prompt optimization as a black-box problem, applying sophisticated search algorithms without characterizing the landscape topology they navigate. We present a systematic analysis of fitness landscape structures in prompt engineering using autocorrelation analysis across semantic embedding spaces. Through experiments on error detection tasks with two distinct prompt generation strategies -- systematic enumeration (1,024 prompts) and novelty-driven diversification (1,000 prompts) -- we reveal fundamentally different landscape topologies. Systematic prompt generation yields smoothly decaying autocorrelation, while diversified generation exhibits non-monotonic patterns with peak correlation at intermediate semantic distances, indicating rugged, hierarchically structured landscapes. Task-specific analysis across 10 error detection categories reveals varying degrees of ruggedness across different error types. Our findings provide an empirical foundation for understanding the complexity of optimization in prompt engineering landscapes.