Occluding the Solution Space: Planner-Agnostic Adversarial Attacks on Tolerance-Aware Manipulation

πŸ“… 2026-07-04
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing adversarial attacks on motion planning rely on precise pose targets and require planner-in-the-loop queries, limiting their generalizability. This work proposes a planner-agnostic adversarial attack framework that shifts the attack objective from exact pose accuracy to task-level feasibility, evaluating system robustness by masking feasible solution spaces. The key innovation lies in introducing a kinematic occupancy heatmap to characterize workspace capability, combined with offline modeling and online constrained maximum coverage optimization to efficiently deploy adversarial obstacles under geometric constraints. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms baseline approaches in both simulation and real-world scenarios, reliably inducing planning failures with higher computational efficiency.
πŸ“ Abstract
Adversarial attacks on motion planning are crucial for evaluating and quantifying the intrinsic robustness of robotic manipulation. However, existing approaches are typically limited by restrictive exact-pose objectives and their reliance on planner-in-the-loop queries. To address these limitations, we propose a planner-agnostic attack framework for tolerance-aware manipulation. Our approach shifts the evaluation paradigm to task-level feasibility over goal regions, efficiently inserting adversarial obstacles without requiring oracle access to the victim system. Offline, we characterize the robot's intrinsic workspace capabilities via a kinematic occupancy heatmap, which encodes the density of feasible trajectories and robustness priors without invoking a specific planner. Online, we formulate the attack as a budgeted maximum-coverage optimization, strategically deploying obstacles subject to explicit geometric constraints to occlude the solution space. Extensive experiments across simulation and real-world scenarios demonstrate that our method reliably induces planning failures, significantly outperforming planner-in-the-loop baselines in both computational efficiency and attack efficacy.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

adversarial attacks
motion planning
planner-agnostic
tolerance-aware manipulation
solution space occlusion
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

planner-agnostic
tolerance-aware manipulation
kinematic occupancy heatmap
adversarial obstacle insertion
maximum-coverage optimization
Keke Tang
Keke Tang
Full Professor of Cybersecurity, Guangzhou University (always open to cooperation)
AI security3D visioncomputer graphicsrobotics
T
Tianyu Hao
Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
W
Weilong Peng
Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
H
Hao Jiang
University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Feng Wu
Feng Wu
National University of Singapore
Mechine LearningMedical Time Series
P
Peican Zhu
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, China
Jianmin Ji
Jianmin Ji
University of Science and Technology of China
Cognitive RoboticsReinforcement LearningAnswer Set Programming
Z
Zhihong Tian
Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China