Brand-as-Memory: Vision-Language Models Encode Causal, Mechanistically Localizable Credibility Priors for News Sources

📅 2026-07-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the susceptibility of vision-language models to media brand cues—such as mastheads and logos—that induce content-agnostic priors in news credibility assessment. The authors introduce the CueTrust benchmark and the Source-Override Index (SOI), leveraging sparse autoencoders, inter-layer interventions, and cross-model diagnostics to mechanistically reveal, for the first time, that this prior exhibits a dual-encoding structure, is spatially localizable, and consistently replicable across models. Experiments demonstrate that brand cues can significantly modulate credibility judgments across an 11 log-odds range (ρ = 0.88). Targeted interventions reduce the source-overriding effect by 41% and generalize effectively to unseen media outlets, highlighting both the vulnerability and mitigability of such spurious associations in multimodal trust evaluation.
📝 Abstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) increasingly read news and web content as images, where the publisher's identity is visually present. We show that VLMs carry a strong source-credibility prior keyed on outlet identity, and study it along three axes. (i) Cross-model benchmark. We introduce CueTrust, a cross-model diagnostic that measures which surface source cue overrides an article's content evidence via a Source-Override Index (SOI). Across seven VLMs and five cues, the vulnerability profile is model- and scale-dependent, and the override is outlet-identity-specific and encoding-invariant, firing from the masthead name, the logo image, or the bare domain, but not from a named author, in-text authority, or page layout (clean negative controls). (ii) Mechanistic account. For the brand cue, we give a full mechanistic account: swapping only the masthead moves credibility across an approximately 11 log-odds range that tracks professional ratings (rho = 0.88 with Media Bias/Fact Check). The prior is dual-coded (name and logo), strengthens with scale, is causally formed at layers 19-21, carried by interpretable seed-stable sparse-autoencoder features, and recurs at the same relative locus in a second model family. It overrides content (about 1.8x) as a signal-magnitude effect within a shared pathway, not a privileged route. Steering the localized direction selectively reduces the override (41% reduction) and generalizes to held-out outlets, confirming the prior is causally used, not merely decodable. Deployed VLMs may thus defer to source identity over the evidence in front of them, a reliability failure we can measure across models, localize, and causally probe. We release the stimulus suite and CueTrust.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

vision-language models
source credibility
news trustworthiness
media bias
credibility prior
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

vision-language models
source credibility prior
mechanistic interpretability
CueTrust
sparse autoencoders
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.