Whose Voice Counts? Mapping Stakeholder Perspectives on AI Through Public Submissions to the U.S. Government

📅 2026-05-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

194K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses significant disparities in how different stakeholder groups perceive the societal impacts of artificial intelligence, with individual concerns often marginalized in policy discourse. Drawing on public comments submitted during the consultation period for the Trump administration’s American AI Initiative, the authors develop a rigorous corpus-cleaning pipeline and employ topic modeling alongside frequency analysis to systematically compare the focal concerns of academics, private-sector entities, and individual citizens—and to assess their representation in official policy texts. The findings reveal that individuals predominantly emphasize AI’s tangible effects on everyday life, whereas private-sector respondents prioritize safety, development, and regulatory frameworks. Current AI policy largely reflects the latter’s agenda, exhibiting a marked underrepresentation of individual perspectives and exposing a structural deficit in mechanisms for meaningful public participation.
📝 Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more common in our daily lives, it is important to understand how different stakeholders comprehend and envisage the role that these technologies play in shaping social, political, and economic realities. In this paper, we investigate public perceptions of AI based on a corpus of letters submitted during the public consultation for the Trump Administration's US AI Action Plan. To this aim, we release a corpus cleaning pipeline and perform topic modelling and frequency analysis to explore predominant topics discussed by different subgroups (e.g., academia, individuals, private sector) and those appearing in the AI Action Plan. Our results show that individuals voice strong concerns related to the impact of AI on life, while other stakeholders are more concerned with AI development. Our comparison of topics suggests that the AI Action Plan reflects predominantly the concerns of the private sector on security, policies, and development, with individuals' concerns less represented.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

AI governance
stakeholder perspectives
public consultation
policy representation
artificial intelligence
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

corpus cleaning pipeline
topic modelling
stakeholder analysis
public consultation
AI policy
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Alina Karakanta
Alina Karakanta
Assistant Professor of Machine Translation, Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
Machine TranslationAudiovisual TranslationTranslation studiesMedia Accessibility
A
Alex Christiansen
Department of Linguistics and Communication, University of Birmingham
Tomás Dodds
Tomás Dodds
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Journalism StudiesArtificial IntelligenceMedia InnovationPublic Interest Technology
B
Bissie Anderson
Department of Linguistics and Communication, University of Birmingham
M
Matteo Fuoli
Department of Linguistics and Communication, University of Birmingham
M
Marcus Perlman
Department of Linguistics and Communication, University of Birmingham
A
Aletta G. Dorst
Leiden University Centre for Linguistics, Leiden University