🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the impact of population initialization methods on the performance of genetic programming for symbolic regression. Within the NSGA-II multi-objective evolutionary framework, it systematically compares three random initialization strategies against an initialization based on small-scale optimized solutions from Exhaustive Symbolic Regression (ESR) across multiple synthetic and real-world datasets. The findings reveal that although ESR-based initialization offers a modest advantage in early evolutionary stages, the choice of initialization strategy does not significantly affect the accuracy or complexity of the final Pareto front; differences between strategies vanish within a few generations. These results challenge the common assumption that sophisticated initialization substantially enhances symbolic regression performance, suggesting instead that the structure of the initial population has limited influence on long-term evolutionary outcomes.
📝 Abstract
We analyze the effect of optimizing the initial population of genetic programming (GP) for symbolic regression (SR) on the accuracy and complexity of solutions. We compare three well-established random initialization methods as well as initialization with small optimized solutions from exhaustive symbolic regression (ESR) using a GP/SR implementation which is based on the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm NSGA-II. We compare the final Pareto fronts found with each initialization method on twelve synthetic problems of varying complexity and one real-world dataset. We find no significant differences in accuracy or model complexity among the initialization methods. The initial advantage of initialization with ESR disappears after only a few generations. Our results show that, given similar diversity in the initial population, the effect of the initialization method in GP-based symbolic regression on the final Pareto front is negligible.