🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of a unified framework for quantifying and predicting the computational accuracy of physical neural networks (PNNs) across diverse tasks. The authors propose the Hotelling Trace Criterion (HTC), a training-free, task-conditioned metric that evaluates the separability of internal PNN states and predicts classification performance. They demonstrate a power-law relationship between classification loss and HTC, with data from distinct physical systems—including nonlinear optical fibers, VCSELs, and coupled oscillators—collapsing onto a universal scaling curve for the same task. Furthermore, HTC reveals a non-uniform distribution of representational capacity across network layers during training. On MNIST and Fashion-MNIST benchmarks, HTC exhibits correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99 and 0.97, respectively, with classification loss, enabling accurate performance prediction without training after minimal calibration.
📝 Abstract
Physical neural networks (PNNs) harness the intrinsic complexity of physical systems to perform neural computation, potentially at speeds and energy efficiencies inaccessible to conventional digital hardware. Yet, a principled framework for quantifying and predicting their computing accuracy across diverse substrates has remained elusive. Here we introduce the Hotelling Trace Criterion (HTC), a task-conditioned measure of PNN- state separability that can be evaluated without training. We demonstrate that it predicts PNN classification performance with high fidelity across highly nonlinear optical fibres, vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers, and coupled nonlinear oscillator networks, for benchmark tasks of different difficulty. Classification loss follows a power law in HTC, with Pearson correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99 for MNIST and $\approx$0.97 for Fashion-MNIST, noteworthy experimental and simulated data from physically distinct systems collapse onto a single scaling curve determined by the task rather than the substrate. Applying HTC layer-by-layer during training further reveals that gradient-based optimisation distributes representational capacity unevenly across PNN layers, providing a quantitative diagnostic of training and architecture efficiency invisible to standard loss monitoring. Crucially, once the scaling exponent is established from a small number of trained calibration systems, all further performance predictions require no training since performance can be derived from the much more efficient HTC measurement. These results establish HTC as a substrate-agnostic figure of merit for comparing and scaling PNNs, advancing the field further towards a complete theory connecting fundamental hardware parameters to task performance through universal scaling laws.