Detecting Rug Pulls in Decentralized Exchanges: Machine Learning Evidence from the TON Blockchain

📅 2025-09-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the early detection of rug pull scams in TON blockchain-based decentralized exchanges (DEXs). We propose the first machine learning–based early-warning framework designed for multiple platforms—Ston.Fi and DeDust. Methodologically, we introduce the first unified model comparing two distinct rug pull definitions—sudden TVL decline versus transaction stagnation—revealing cross-platform disparities in feature distributions and enabling platform-adaptive modeling. Our approach integrates asynchronous on-chain transaction data, liquidity metrics, and temporal features into a gradient-boosting model. Experiments demonstrate minute-level detection within five minutes of scam initiation: under the TVL-decline definition, the model achieves an AUC of 0.891; under the transaction-stagnation definition, it attains significantly higher recall. This work delivers both a transferable methodology and a practical early-warning tool for fraud detection in multi-chain DeFi ecosystems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper presents a machine learning framework for the early detection of rug pull scams on decentralized exchanges (DEXs) within The Open Network (TON) blockchain. TON's unique architecture, characterized by asynchronous execution and a massive web2 user base from Telegram, presents a novel and critical environment for fraud analysis. We conduct a comprehensive study on the two largest TON DEXs, Ston.Fi and DeDust, fusing data from both platforms to train our models. A key contribution is the implementation and comparative analysis of two distinct rug pull definitions--TVL-based (a catastrophic liquidity withdrawal) and idle-based (a sudden cessation of all trading activity)--within a single, unified study. We demonstrate that Gradient Boosting models can effectively identify rug pulls within the first five minutes of trading, with the TVL-based method achieving superior AUC (up to 0.891) while the idle-based method excels at recall. Our analysis reveals that while feature sets are consistent across exchanges, their underlying distributions differ significantly, challenging straightforward data fusion and highlighting the need for robust, platform-aware models. This work provides a crucial early-warning mechanism for investors and enhances the security infrastructure of the rapidly growing TON DeFi ecosystem.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Detecting rug pull scams on TON blockchain DEXs
Comparing TVL-based and idle-based fraud definitions
Early identification within first five minutes of trading
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Machine learning framework for early rug pull detection
Comparative analysis of TVL-based and idle-based definitions
Gradient Boosting models identify scams within five minutes
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Dmitry Yaremus
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow 141701, Russia
J
Jianghai Li
Faculty of Computer Science, HSE University, Moscow 109028, Russia
A
Alisa Kalacheva
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 121205, Russia
I
Igor Vodolazov
Independent Researcher, Barcelona 08001, Spain
Yury Yanovich
Yury Yanovich
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
BlockchainStatisticsMachine learning