🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates systematic hesitation in human requests for assistance from robots during human–robot collaborative (HRC) assembly tasks. Method: A mixed-methods user study compares two assistance paradigms—human-initiated versus robot-initiated—and quantifies the impact of help-seeking behavior on emotional response, task efficiency, and user preference. Contribution/Results: Users significantly prefer on-demand assistance and exhibit caution toward proactive robot intervention. The timing and modality of human-initiated help requests critically moderate both affective experience and operational performance. This work provides the first empirical evidence of psychological differences between human–human and human–robot help-seeking behaviors. It proposes a context-aware adaptive assistance framework grounded in empirical findings, offering a deployable interaction paradigm and empirically validated design principles for industrial AI-assisted agents.
📝 Abstract
As robot technology advances, collaboration between humans and robots will become more prevalent in industrial tasks. When humans run into issues in such scenarios, a likely future involves relying on artificial agents or robots for aid. This study identifies key aspects for the design of future user-assisting agents. We analyze quantitative and qualitative data from a user study examining the impact of on-demand assistance received from a remote human in a human-robot collaboration (HRC) assembly task. We study scenarios in which users require help and we assess their experiences in requesting and receiving assistance. Additionally, we investigate participants' perceptions of future non-human assisting agents and whether assistance should be on-demand or unsolicited. Through a user study, we analyze the impact that such design decisions (human or artificial assistant, on-demand or unsolicited help) can have on elicited emotional responses, productivity, and preferences of humans engaged in HRC tasks.