Practical Channel Estimation for Pinching-Antenna Systems: Serial vs. Parallel and Downlink vs. Uplink?

📅 2025-09-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Practical uplink channel estimation in clamped antenna systems faces challenges from electromagnetic compatibility constraints and hardware-induced impairments. Method: We establish a waveguide-based transmission model compliant with EMC requirements, explicitly incorporating bidirectional power allocation, cumulative leakage, and waveguide attenuation. Two antenna activation protocols—serial (one-antenna-at-a-time) and parallel (binary S-matrix-driven)—are comparatively analyzed. Contribution/Results: Parallel activation exhibits theoretical throughput gains under ideal lossless conditions but suffers from numerical instability due to S-matrix crosstalk and leakage accumulation arising from non-orthogonality. We reveal a fundamental physical asymmetry between uplink and downlink channel estimation feasibility. In realistic lossy scenarios, serial activation significantly outperforms parallel, especially for downlink; while parallel is theoretically favorable for uplink, leakage and stability limitations render serial more robust. We propose a “loss-dominated protocol selection criterion,” establishing a new paradigm for channel estimation in space-constrained antenna systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The practical channel estimation in uplink pinching-antenna systems is investigated, in which an electromagnetic-compliant in-waveguide transmission model is exhibited, incorporating both bidirectional power splitting, cumulative power leakage, and waveguide attenuation. Based on this model, the paper investigates two antenna activation protocols for channel estimation: a serial protocol based on one-by-one antenna activation and a parallel protocol utilizing a binary S-Matrix activation. The serial protocol is characterized by its superior numerical stability but a lack of array gain, whereas the parallel protocol theoretically offers array gain but suffers from severe performance degradation due to structural crosstalk from the non-orthogonal S-Matrix and ill-conditioning from cumulative leakage. Furthermore, the paper analyzes the fundamental commonalities and asymmetries between uplink and downlink channel estimation in pinching-antenna systems. Numerical results demonstrate that 1) in an ideal lossless model, the parallel protocol is superior to the serial protocol due to the array gain from simultaneous energy collection in uplink transmission; 2) in a practical model with physical losses, the serial protocol outperforms the parallel protocol, as the performance of the parallel protocol is degraded by the numerical instability from cumulative leakage, which outweighs the benefit of array gain; 3) For downlink channel estimation, the serial protocol is more suitable because it avoids bidirectional power splitting, while the parallel protocol is more suitable for the uplink as it can make full use of array gain.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Investigating channel estimation protocols for pinching-antenna systems
Comparing serial versus parallel antenna activation methods
Analyzing uplink-downlink asymmetries in practical channel estimation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Electromagnetic-compliant in-waveguide transmission model
Serial and parallel antenna activation protocols
Analyzes uplink-downlink channel estimation asymmetries
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.