๐ค AI Summary
This study systematically uncovers the ideological ecosystem and dynamic evolution underlying the โMake America Healthy Againโ (MAHA) online movement, wherein health advocacy coexists with anti-scientific attitudes. Leveraging six years of Reddit data, the research integrates tree-structured few-shot large language models, user-level stance scoring, community network analysis, and psycholinguistic profiling to identify twelve core themes and characterize patterns of issue bundling. Findings reveal that MAHA supporters exhibit strong cross-topic stance bundling and tightly knit community structures, whereas opponents show no significant bundling. Vaccine skepticism emerges as a critical gateway into broader anti-scientific narratives, with anti-fluoride and anti-mask stances during the pandemic progressively evolving into anti-vaccine and generalized anti-science positions. This work provides the first systematic mapping of MAHAโs ideological network architecture and its developmental trajectory.
๐ Abstract
The "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement has created a complex ideological ecosystem within online communities, where advocacy for healthier lifestyles and whole-food diets coexists with vaccine skepticism and anti-science attitudes. Understanding how these interconnected beliefs interact, overlap, and evolve is critical for public health communication and intervention. We uncover the functional overlaps, network structures, engagement patterns, opinion dynamics, and linguistic differences across the full spectrum of MAHA ideologies. Using large-scale Reddit data spanning six years, we identified 12 MAHA-adjacent themes, including mainstream topics such as exercise, whole food, and screen use, as well as contentious topics such as vaccines, masks, GMOs, fluoride, and others. We developed a tree-based few-shot LLM pipeline to classify stances (pro, anti, neutral) across all themes, then computed user-level opinion scores to examine cross-theme interactions and opinion shifts over time. We find that MAHA-aligned users exhibit strong cross-theme bundling and coherent network structure, whereas anti-MAHA users do not bundle beyond chance. MAHA users cluster in a few mainstream subreddits, but post in a wide ecosystem of MAHA-related communities. During the pandemic, anti-fluoride and anti-mask posters transitioned into anti-vaccination posts, and later moved to broader anti-science narratives, suggesting that vaccine skepticism may serve as an entry point into wider anti-science engagement. Pro- and anti-MAHA communities also exhibit distinct psycholinguistic profiles, reflecting deeper ideological and rhetorical divides.