CORTEX: Composite Overlay for Risk Tiering and Exposure in Operational AI Systems

📅 2025-08-24
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Frequent failures of AI systems in high-risk domains pose urgent real-world safety challenges. Method: This paper introduces the first five-layer dynamic risk scoring framework integrating technical vulnerabilities, regulatory compliance, and deployment context. Grounded in analysis of over 1,200 AI incidents, it identifies 29 critical vulnerability categories and innovatively combines a likelihood-impact model, governance-and-context overlay mechanisms, quantified technical attack surface, and environment-specific modulation factors. Risk modeling employs Bayesian aggregation and Monte Carlo simulation to robustly capture long-tail and volatile risks. Contribution/Results: The framework generates actionable composite risk scores, enabling practical applications including AI risk registries, model audits, compliance assessments, and dynamic governance dashboards—thereby significantly enhancing the assessability and governability of AI systems in high-stakes operational environments.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
As the deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in high-stakes sectors - like healthcare, finance, education, justice, and infrastructure has increased - the possibility and impact of failures of these systems have significantly evolved from being a theoretical possibility to practical recurring, systemic risk. This paper introduces CORTEX (Composite Overlay for Risk Tiering and Exposure), a multi-layered risk scoring framework proposed to assess and score AI system vulnerabilities, developed on empirical analysis of over 1,200 incidents documented in the AI Incident Database (AIID), CORTEX categorizes failure modes into 29 technical vulnerability groups. Each vulnerability is scored through a five-tier architecture that combines: (1) utility-adjusted Likelihood x Impact calculations; (2) governance + contextual overlays aligned with regulatory frameworks, such as the EU AI Act, NIST RMF, OECD principles; (3) technical surface scores, covering exposure vectors like drift, traceability, and adversarial risk; (4) environmental and residual modifiers tailored to context of where these systems are being deployed to use; and (5) a final layered assessment via Bayesian risk aggregation and Monte Carlo simulation to model volatility and long-tail risks. The resulting composite score can be operationalized across AI risk registers, model audits, conformity checks, and dynamic governance dashboards.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Assessing AI system vulnerabilities in high-stakes sectors
Categorizing failure modes into technical vulnerability groups
Developing multi-layered risk scoring framework for AI systems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-layered risk scoring framework for AI vulnerabilities
Five-tier architecture combining likelihood, impact and governance
Bayesian risk aggregation with Monte Carlo simulation modeling
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Aoun E Muhammad
University of Regina, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science
Kin Choong Yow
Kin Choong Yow
Professor of Software Systems Engineering, University of Regina
Generic Intelligence and Smart Environments
J
Jamel Baili
King Khalid University, Department of Computer Engineering, College of Computer Science
Y
Yongwon Cho
Soonchunhyang University, Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Yunyoung Nam
Yunyoung Nam
Soonchunhyang University