A Survey of Secure Semantic Communications

📅 2025-01-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Emerging security and privacy threats throughout the full lifecycle of 6G semantic communication (SemCom) pose critical challenges to system integrity and user trust. Method: This paper systematically analyzes threats across three core phases—semantic model training, transfer, and transmission—and proposes the first SemCom-specific, three-stage threat taxonomy. It establishes the inaugural comprehensive survey framework for defense-in-depth techniques tailored to 6G SemCom, integrating cross-layer mechanisms including physical-layer security, differential privacy, blockchain, and adversarial training. Contribution/Results: The work holistically categorizes over 30 security techniques, clarifying their applicability scopes and inherent limitations. Furthermore, it identifies six key future research directions—including semantic trust certification and lightweight semantic encryption—thereby providing a rigorous theoretical foundation and a concrete technical roadmap for advancing secure 6G semantic communication.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Semantic communication (SemCom) is regarded as a promising and revolutionary technology in 6G, aiming to transcend the constraints of ``Shannon's trap"by filtering out redundant information and extracting the core of effective data. Compared to traditional communication paradigms, SemCom offers several notable advantages, such as reducing the burden on data transmission, enhancing network management efficiency, and optimizing resource allocation. Numerous researchers have extensively explored SemCom from various perspectives, including network architecture, theoretical analysis, potential technologies, and future applications. However, as SemCom continues to evolve, a multitude of security and privacy concerns have arisen, posing threats to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of SemCom systems. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the technologies that can be utilized to secure SemCom. Firstly, we elaborate on the entire life cycle of SemCom, which includes the model training, model transfer, and semantic information transmission phases. Then, we identify the security and privacy issues that emerge during these three stages. Furthermore, we summarize the techniques available to mitigate these security and privacy threats, including data cleaning, robust learning, defensive strategies against backdoor attacks, adversarial training, differential privacy, cryptography, blockchain technology, model compression, and physical-layer security. Lastly, this paper outlines future research directions to guide researchers in related fields.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

6G technology
Semantic Communication
Security and Privacy Issues
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Semantic Communication
Security Enhancements
Privacy Protection
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Rui Meng
Rui Meng
Salesforce Research
Machine LearningNatural Language Processing
S
Song Gao
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
D
Dayu Fan
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
Haixiao Gao
Haixiao Gao
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
semantic communication
Y
Yining Wang
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
X
Xiaodong Xu
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China; Department of Broadband Communication, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, 518066, Guangdong, China
Bizhu Wang
Bizhu Wang
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Anomaly detectionSemantic CommunicationLLM
Suyu Lv
Suyu Lv
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
wireless communications
Z
Zhidi Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
M
Mengying Sun
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
Shujun Han
Shujun Han
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
C
Chen Dong
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China
Xiaofeng Tao
Xiaofeng Tao
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
wireless communication
P
Ping Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Networking and Switching Technology, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, 100876, China; Department of Broadband Communication, Peng Cheng Laboratory, Shenzhen, 518066, Guangdong, China