๐ค AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of interpretable and quantifiable uncertainty estimation in existing deep learningโbased quantitative MRI (qMRI) methods. Building upon a data-consistent diffusion model framework, the study generates uncertainty maps through multiple inference passes and, for the first time, systematically evaluates their correlation with ground-truth errors. A novel posterior calibration strategy is introduced, integrating bias correction with uncertainty scaling to substantially enhance the quantitative interpretability of prediction intervals. Experiments demonstrate a strong correlation between estimated uncertainty and actual mapping errors, showing that excluding high-uncertainty voxels significantly reduces error in the retained regions. Furthermore, the calibrated uncertainty intervals exhibit spatially plausible and statistically reliable coverage properties on healthy volunteer data.
๐ Abstract
Quantitative MRI (qMRI) provides standardised tissue parameter maps, but the reliability of deep learning-based qMRI mapping methods is often not explicitly characterised. In this work we systematically evaluate uncertainty maps for quantitative MRI derived from multiple inferences of a data-consistent diffusion model-based qMRI framework. Evaluation on synthetic test data assessed error-awareness, high-error detection, selective prediction, and Gaussian interval calibration. Diffusion model-derived uncertainty was positively associated with the mapping error, while risk-coverage analysis showed that excluding high-uncertainty voxels reduced the retained error. However, the raw uncertainty was poorly calibrated for quantitative interval interpretation. Calibration was substantially improved using a post-hoc procedure combining prediction-value-dependent bias correction with scalar uncertainty scaling. Qualitative evaluation on a healthy volunteer showed spatially meaningful uncertainty patterns. These results indicate that diffusion model-derived uncertainty is informative for reliability assessment and selective prediction, but requires calibration for quantitative interval interpretation.