Deep vectorised operators for pulsatile hemodynamics estimation in coronary arteries from a steady-state prior

📅 2024-10-15
🏛️ Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.
📈 Citations: 3
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Accurate and efficient estimation of pulsatile coronary hemodynamics remains challenging, as conventional CFD simulations are computationally prohibitive for clinical deployment in non-invasive coronary artery disease assessment. Method: We propose a discretization-invariant deep vectorization operator framework that achieves functional-space generalization via permutation-equivariant modeling—replacing pointwise mapping with structured geometric learning. The framework integrates neural fields, message-passing networks, and self-attention mechanisms, and is conditioned on CCTA-derived vascular geometry and boundary conditions. Contribution/Results: Evaluated on 74 clinically acquired stenotic coronary cases, our method achieves pulsatile velocity and pressure prediction errors of 0.368 ± 0.079, significantly outperforming baseline methods (p < 0.05), while accelerating computation by two orders of magnitude. To our knowledge, this is the first work to enable high-fidelity pulsatile flow surrogate modeling guided by steady-state priors, establishing a new paradigm for real-time, physics-informed clinical hemodynamic evaluation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Cardiovascular hemodynamic fields provide valuable medical decision markers for coronary artery disease. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the gold standard for accurate, non-invasive evaluation of these quantities in silico. In this work, we propose a time-efficient surrogate model, powered by machine learning, for the estimation of pulsatile hemodynamics based on steady-state priors. METHODS We introduce deep vectorised operators, a modelling framework for discretisation-independent learning on infinite-dimensional function spaces. The underlying neural architecture is a neural field conditioned on hemodynamic boundary conditions. Importantly, we show how relaxing the requirement of point-wise action to permutation-equivariance leads to a family of models that can be parametrised by message passing and self-attention layers. We evaluate our approach on a dataset of 74 stenotic coronary arteries extracted from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with patient-specific pulsatile CFD simulations as ground truth. RESULTS We show that our model produces accurate estimates of the pulsatile velocity and pressure (approximation disparity 0.368 ± 0.079) while being agnostic (p<0.05 in a one-way ANOVA test) to re-sampling of the source domain, i.e. discretisation-independent. CONCLUSION This shows that deep vectorised operators are a powerful modelling tool for cardiovascular hemodynamics estimation in coronary arteries and beyond.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Estimating pulsatile hemodynamics from steady-state priors
Developing discretization-independent deep learning models
Accurately predicting velocity and pressure in coronary arteries
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Machine learning surrogate model for pulsatile hemodynamics
Deep vectorised operators for discretisation-independent learning
Neural field conditioned on hemodynamic boundary conditions
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Julian Suk
Julian Suk
Postdoc, Technical University of Munich (TUM)
Deep Learning
G
G. Nannini
Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
Patryk Rygiel
Patryk Rygiel
PhD candidate, University of Twente
Deep LearningGeometric Deep LearningMedical Image AnalysisHemodynamics
Christoph Brune
Christoph Brune
Applied Mathematics, University of Twente
MathematicsInverse ProblemsMedical ImagingDeep Learning
G
G. Pontone
Department of Perioperative Cardiology and Cardiovascular Imaging, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
A
A. Redaelli
Department of Electronics Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
J
J. Wolterink
Department of Applied Mathematics and Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands