Picture the Epsilon: Pursuing Identity-Level Privacy Guarantees for Images

📅 2026-08-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
研究针对图像生成器的隐私保护问题,通过比较四种审计方法(GaussMech、KDE-LR、MMD-TV、ROC-HT)来评估身份级别的差分隐私参数ε。
📝 Abstract
Image-to-image face generators are widely used, and visual dissimilarity between their outputs and source images is sometimes treated as evidence of privacy. Auditing whether these systems satisfy formal identity-level (epsilon, delta)-differential privacy requires choosing among several distinct routes for converting embedding-space observations into estimates or bounds on the differential privacy parameter epsilon. We present a comparative study of four such audits applicable to pre-trained, black-box face generators: a Gaussian-mechanism reading of per-identity sensitivity (GaussMech); a per-dimension kernel-density log-ratio aggregated by basic composition (KDE-LR); an analytical population-level lower bound on pure-DP epsilon derived from the maximum mean discrepancy via the total variation distance (MMD-TV); and a hypothesis-testing evaluation of a cross-validated classifier's out-of-fold ROC (ROC-HT). For each method we make explicit its assumptions, hyperparameter dependence, finite-sample limitations, and the regime in which its epsilon estimate is informative. Applied to FaceFusion and InstantID across multiple identity encoders and reference datasets, the audits consistently reveal substantial identity distinguishability while reporting markedly different epsilon estimates that reflect each method's distinct assumptions and finite-sample treatment. In this high-distinguishability regime, the experiments do not support a reliable ranking of the four methods. Their relative trade-offs should be evaluated on partially private mechanisms, which we identify as the natural next study. The resulting framework places these audits in a shared identity-level audit setting and clarifies how their assumptions and finite-sample treatments shape the resulting differential privacy estimates.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

differential privacy
face generators
identity-level privacy
epsilon
audit
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

differential privacy
face generator
audit method
identity-level privacy
black-box
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Arman Zareian Jahromi
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
V
Vishnu Bondalakunta
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
M
Mohammad Akbar Bin Shah
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
N
Naimul Haque
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Shuangqing Wei
Shuangqing Wei
School of EECS, Louisiana State University
Communication TheoryInformation Theoryand Statistical Inference
G
George T. Amariucai
Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA