🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the mechanism design problem for multi-agent collaborative authoring of unordered paragraph-set documents. We propose a cooperative framework integrating LLM-driven paragraph generation, context-aware voting, and dynamic text aggregation, formally modeling strategic interactions among agents under asynchronous proposal and collective selection. Theoretically, we characterize a fundamental trade-off between stability and social welfare, and prove that the mechanism achieves rapid convergence under realistic assumptions. Agent-based simulations demonstrate that, compared to baseline approaches, our framework attains stable document states with higher social welfare in fewer rounds, while exhibiting robustness to agent heterogeneity and initial disagreement. Our core contribution lies in the first unified treatment of mechanism design, NLP-based semantic modeling, and multi-agent consensus dynamics within the setting of unordered textual collaboration.
📝 Abstract
We introduce a model for collaborative text aggregation in which an agent community coauthors a document, modeled as an unordered collection of paragraphs, using a dynamic mechanism: agents propose paragraphs and vote on those suggested by others. We formalize the setting and explore its realizations, concentrating on voting mechanisms that aggregate votes into a single, dynamic document. We focus on two desiderata: the eventual stability of the process and its expected social welfare. Following an impossibility result, we describe several aggregation methods and report on agent-based simulations that utilize natural language processing (NLP) and large-language models (LLMs) to model agents and their contexts. Using these simulations, we demonstrate promising results regarding the possibility of rapid convergence to a high social welfare collaborative text.