Beam Geometry and Input Dimensionality: Impact on Sparse-Sampling Artifact Correction for Clinical CT with U-Nets

📅 2025-08-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study systematically investigates how beam geometry (parallel-, fan-, and cone-beam) and input dimensionality (2D, 2.5D, 3D) affect the performance of deep learning–based sparse-sampling streak artifact correction in clinical CT. We propose a 2.5D input representation that incorporates local 3D contextual information via multi-planar slice recombination and design a corresponding U-Net architecture, evaluating all configurations uniformly on Astra Toolbox–simulated data. Contrary to expectations, the axial 2D U-Net—trained solely on 2D slices—achieves significantly lower MSE and higher SSIM than both 2.5D and 3D counterparts, while also demonstrating superior generalization. This challenges the common assumption that higher-dimensional inputs inherently improve reconstruction fidelity, revealing instead that local texture modeling is more critical than global geometric modeling for artifact correction. The findings provide empirical evidence supporting lightweight, computationally efficient CT denoising architectures optimized for clinical deployment.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This study aims to investigate the effect of various beam geometries and dimensions of input data on the sparse-sampling streak artifact correction task with U-Nets for clinical CT scans as a means of incorporating the volumetric context into artifact reduction tasks to improve model performance. A total of 22 subjects were retrospectively selected (01.2016-12.2018) from the Technical University of Munich's research hospital, TUM Klinikum rechts der Isar. Sparsely-sampled CT volumes were simulated with the Astra toolbox for parallel, fan, and cone beam geometries. 2048 views were taken as full-view scans. 2D and 3D U-Nets were trained and validated on 14, and tested on 8 subjects, respectively. For the dimensionality study, in addition to the 512x512 2D CT images, the CT scans were further pre-processed to generate a so-called '2.5D', and 3D data: Each CT volume was divided into 64x64x64 voxel blocks. The 3D data refers to individual 64-voxel blocks. An axial, coronal, and sagittal cut through the center of each block resulted in three 64x64 2D patches that were rearranged as a single 64x64x3 image, proposed as 2.5D data. Model performance was assessed with the mean squared error (MSE) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM). For all geometries, the 2D U-Net trained on axial 2D slices results in the best MSE and SSIM values, outperforming the 2.5D and 3D input data dimensions.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Investigating beam geometry effects on CT artifact correction
Assessing input data dimensionality impact on U-Net performance
Improving sparse-sampling streak artifact reduction in clinical CT
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

U-Nets for CT artifact correction
Beam geometry impact on model performance
2D U-Net outperforms 2.5D and 3D inputs
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
T
Tina Dorosti
Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences; Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine and Health, TUM Klinikum; Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Germany
J
Johannes Thalhammer
Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences; Institute for Advanced Study; Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
S
Sebastian Peterhansl
Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences; Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany
Daniela Pfeiffer
Daniela Pfeiffer
Professor of Radiology, Technische Universität München
Franz Pfeiffer
Franz Pfeiffer
Professor for Physics, Technical University of Munich
X-ray imaging/microscopy/opticsComputed Tomography (CT)Phase Retrieval/ PtychographyMedical ImagingLung Imaging
F
Florian Schaff
Chair of Biomedical Physics, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences; Munich Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Germany