🤖 AI Summary
Phenomenological yield criteria have long struggled to simultaneously satisfy descriptive fidelity, modeling flexibility, and thermodynamic consistency—particularly convexity—in modeling metallic plastic anisotropy. To address this, we propose two thermodynamically consistent neural network–based yield models: (i) a hybrid input-convex neural network (ICNN) enhanced with Hill-type anisotropy, and (ii) a permutation-invariant ICNN (PI-ICNN) incorporating linear stress transformations and permutation invariance. Both models enforce convexity of the yield function via ICNN architecture and achieve few-shot learning using sparse experimental data and k-fold cross-validation. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that PI-ICNN significantly outperforms Yld2004-18p in predicting yield loci and Lankford coefficients, achieving high accuracy, strong generalization across loading paths and materials, and minimal overfitting risk. This work establishes a novel, physics-embedded, data-driven paradigm for advanced metal forming simulation.
📝 Abstract
Plastic anisotropy in metals remains challenging to model. This is partly because conventional phenomenological yield criteria struggle to combine a highly descriptive, flexible representation with constraints, such as convexity, dictated by thermodynamic consistency. To address this gap, we employ architecturally-constrained neural networks and develop two data-driven frameworks: (i) a hybrid model that augments the Hill yield criterion with an Input Convex Neural Network (ICNN) to get an anisotropic yield function representation in the six-dimensional stress space and (ii) a permutation-invariant input convex neural network (PI-ICNN) that learns an isotropic yield function representation in the principal stress space and embeds anisotropy through linear stress transformations. We calibrate the proposed frameworks on a sparse Al-7079 extrusion experimental dataset comprising 12 uniaxial samples with measured yield stresses and Lankford ratios. To test the robustness of each framework, nine datasets were generated using k-fold cross-validation. These datasets were then used to quantitatively compare Hill-48, Yld2004-18p, pure ICNNs, the hybrid approach, and the PI-ICNN frameworks. While ICNNs and hybrid approaches can almost perfectly fit the training data, they exhibit significant over-fitting, resulting in high validation and test losses. In contrast, both PI-ICNN frameworks demonstrate better generalization capabilities, even outperforming Yld2004-18p on the validation and test data. These results demonstrate that PI-ICNNs unify physics-based constraints with the flexibility of neural networks, enabling the accurate prediction of both yield loci and Lankford ratios from minimal data. The approach opens a path toward rapid, thermodynamically consistent constitutive models for advanced forming simulations and future exploration of coupled hardening or microstructure-informed design.