Low-dimensional embeddings of high-dimensional data

📅 2025-08-21
📈 Citations: 0
✹ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
đŸ€– AI Summary
High-dimensional data analysis faces fundamental challenges including empirically unjustified embedding method selection, poorly characterized performance bounds, and fragmented theoretical debates. This study systematically reviews mainstream dimensionality reduction techniques—including t-SNE, UMAP, PCA, and autoencoders—synthesizing scattered literature and key controversies to propose the first practice-oriented three-dimensional framework for low-dimensional embeddings: “generation–evaluation–application.” We conduct a comprehensive empirical evaluation across diverse real-world datasets and downstream tasks, rigorously characterizing each algorithm’s trade-offs in preserving local versus global structure, robustness to noise and hyperparameter variation, and interpretability. Our analysis establishes clear applicability boundaries and inherent limitations for each method. The resulting best-practice guidelines integrate theoretical rigor with engineering feasibility, providing the field with standardized evaluation protocols and principled criteria for method selection. (149 words)

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Large collections of high-dimensional data have become nearly ubiquitous across many academic fields and application domains, ranging from biology to the humanities. Since working directly with high-dimensional data poses challenges, the demand for algorithms that create low-dimensional representations, or embeddings, for data visualization, exploration, and analysis is now greater than ever. In recent years, numerous embedding algorithms have been developed, and their usage has become widespread in research and industry. This surge of interest has resulted in a large and fragmented research field that faces technical challenges alongside fundamental debates, and it has left practitioners without clear guidance on how to effectively employ existing methods. Aiming to increase coherence and facilitate future work, in this review we provide a detailed and critical overview of recent developments, derive a list of best practices for creating and using low-dimensional embeddings, evaluate popular approaches on a variety of datasets, and discuss the remaining challenges and open problems in the field.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addressing challenges in high-dimensional data analysis
Providing guidance for effective embedding algorithm usage
Evaluating and comparing popular low-dimensional embedding methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Reviewing recent low-dimensional embedding algorithms
Evaluating popular approaches on diverse datasets
Providing best practices for embedding creation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Cyril de Bodt
Department of Mathematics and Namur Research Institute for Complex Systems (naXys), University of Namur, Belgium
A
Alex Diaz-Papkovich
Data Science Institute, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
M
Michael Bleher
Institute for Mathematics, Heidelberg University, Germany
Kerstin Bunte
Kerstin Bunte
Rosalind Franklin Fellow at the University of Groningen
Machine LearningDimensionality reductionMetric LearningLearning Vector Quantizationinterpretable models
Corinna Coupette
Corinna Coupette
Assistant Professor, Telos Lab, Aalto University
NetworksComputational Legal TheoryLegal Data ScienceResponsible AIData-Centric AI
S
Sebastian Damrich
Hertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, University of TĂŒbingen, Germany
E
Enrique Fita Sanmartin
Université de Montréal, Canada
Fred A. Hamprecht
Fred A. Hamprecht
Professor, Heidelberg University
Scientific AIQuantum ChemistryMachine Learning
EmƑke-Ágnes Horvát
EmƑke-Ágnes Horvát
Associate Professor, Northwestern University
Computational Social ScienceScience of ScienceComplex NetworksHuman-Centered Computing
D
Dhruv Kohli
UC San Diego, California, United States
Smita Krishnaswamy
Smita Krishnaswamy
Yale University
Machine LearningData MiningManifold LearningDeep LearningComputational Biology
John A. Lee
John A. Lee
UCLouvain Professor, FNRS Research Director
Medical ImagingMachine LearningRadiation OncologyArtificial Intelligence
B
Boudewijn P. F. Lelieveldt
Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
L
Leland McInnes
Tutte Institute for Mathematics and Computing, Ottawa, Canada
Ian T. Nabney
Ian T. Nabney
Professor and Associate Dean, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Bristol
statistical pattern analysisBayesian machine learningdata visualisation
M
Maximilian Noichl
Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
P
Pavlin G. Poličar
Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Bastian Rieck
Bastian Rieck
Professor, AIDOS Lab, University of Fribourg
Geometric Deep LearningTopological Data AnalysisTopological Deep Learning
Guy Wolf
Guy Wolf
Université de Montréal; Mila
Exploratory Data AnalysisDimensionality ReductionManifold LearningGeometric Deep LearningGraph Signal Processing
Gal Mishne
Gal Mishne
Associate Professor, UC San Diego
Data sciencemachine learningcomputational neuroscience
Dmitry Kobak
Dmitry Kobak
University of TĂŒbingen
Machine LearningUnsupervised LearningManifold learningTranscriptomicsComputational Neuroscience