🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of unified communication principles between autonomous vehicles and external road users, a domain whose research trajectory remains unclear. Through a bibliometric analysis of 620 academic papers, policy document interpretation, and cross-dimensional comparison, the work systematically integrates academic, industrial, and regulatory perspectives. It reveals, for the first time, a convergence on the overarching goal of “safety-first,” yet persistent divergence regarding the necessity and implementation of external communication. The study further uncovers a “filtering funnel” mechanism that mediates the transition from research to regulation. Notably, external communication signals are increasingly converging toward minimalistic visual cues, offering a critical direction for future efforts to shift toward evidence synthesis and adaptive frameworks.
📝 Abstract
As autonomous vehicles enter public spaces, external human-machine interfaces are proposed to support communication with external road users. A decade of research has produced hundreds of studies and reviews, yet it remains unclear whether the field is converging on shared principles or diverging across approaches. We present a multi-dimensional analysis of 620 publications, complemented by industry deployments and regulatory documents, to track research evolution and identify convergence. The analysis reveals several field-level patterns. First, convergence on a safety-first core: simple visual cues that clarify intent. Second, sustained divergence in necessity and implementation. Third, a progressive filtering funnel: broad exploration in research and concepts narrows in deployment and is codified by regulation into a minimal set of permitted signals. These insights point to a shift in emphasis for future work, from producing new prototypes toward consolidating evidence, clarifying points of contention, and developing frameworks that can adapt across contexts.