A first realization of reinforcement learning-based closed-loop EEG-TMS

📅 2026-02-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Traditional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) employs a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to account for inter- and intra-individual variations in brain states, thereby limiting its neuromodulatory precision. This study presents the first closed-loop, real-time EEG-TMS system driven by reinforcement learning, which eliminates the need for predefined target phases. Instead, it leverages machine learning to automatically identify individual mu-rhythm phases associated with high or low corticospinal excitability and triggers TMS accordingly in real time. By integrating reinforcement learning, online EEG phase detection, and precise stimulation timing control, the system achieves fully data-driven, user-independent closed-loop neuromodulation for the first time. Experimental results demonstrate its ability to reliably distinguish high- and low-excitability mu phases, with repeated stimulation inducing long-term potentiation or depression of sensorimotor network functional connectivity, respectively, thereby establishing a novel paradigm for personalized brain modulation therapy.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a powerful tool to investigate neurophysiology of the human brain and treat brain disorders. Traditionally, therapeutic TMS has been applied in a one-size-fits-all approach, disregarding inter- and intra-individual differences. Brain state-dependent EEG-TMS, such as coupling TMS with a pre-specified phase of the sensorimotor mu-rhythm, enables the induction of differential neuroplastic effects depending on the targeted phase. But this approach is still user-dependent as it requires defining an a-priori target phase. Objectives: To present a first realization of a machine-learning-based, closed-loop real-time EEG-TMS setup to identify user-independently the individual mu-rhythm phase associated with high- vs. low-corticospinal excitability states. Methods: We applied EEG-TMS to 25 participants targeting the supplementary motor area-primary motor cortex network and used a reinforcement learning algorithm to identify the mu-rhythm phase associated with high- vs. low corticospinal excitability. We employed linear mixed effects models and Bayesian analysis to determine effects of reinforced learning on corticospinal excitability indexed by motor evoked potential amplitude, and functional connectivity indexed by the imaginary part of resting-state EEG coherence. Results: Reinforcement learning effectively identified the mu-rhythm phase associated with high- vs. low-excitability states, and their repetitive stimulation resulted in long-term increases vs. decreases in functional connectivity in the stimulated sensorimotor network. Conclusions: We demonstrated for the first time the feasibility of closed-loop EEG-TMS in humans, a critical step towards individualized treatment of brain disorders.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

closed-loop EEG-TMS
individualized brain stimulation
mu-rhythm phase
corticospinal excitability
reinforcement learning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

reinforcement learning
closed-loop EEG-TMS
mu-rhythm phase
corticospinal excitability
individualized neuromodulation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
D
Dania Humaidan
Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Jiahua Xu
Jiahua Xu
Computer Science Department, University College London
BlockchainData scienceRisk managementInsuranceBehavioral finance
J
Jing Chen
Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Christoph Zrenner
Christoph Zrenner
University of Toronto
D
David Emanuel Vetter
Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
L
Laura Marzetti
Department of Engineering and Geology, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy
P
Paolo Belardinelli
Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
T
Timo Roine
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
R
Risto J. Ilmoniemi
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
Gian Luca Romani
Gian Luca Romani
University of Chieti-Pescara
PhysicsNeuroscience
Ulf Ziemann
Ulf Ziemann
Professor of Neurology, Eberhard-Karls University of Tübingen
Human cortexplasticitynon-invasive brain stimulationbrain-state-dependent stimulationneuropharmacology