KLOD: Locality-Preserving Knowledge Editing via Non-Target Distribution Preservation

๐Ÿ“… 2026-08-27
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
ๆœฌๆ–‡ๆๅ‡บKLODๆ–นๆณ•๏ผŒ้€š่ฟ‡ไฟๆŒ้ž็›ฎๆ ‡ๅˆ†ๅธƒๆฅ่งฃๅ†ณๅŸบไบŽๅพฎ่ฐƒ็š„็Ÿฅ่ฏ†็ผ–่พ‘ไธญ็š„ๅฑ€้ƒจๆ€ง้€€ๅŒ–้—ฎ้ข˜ใ€‚
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Fine-tuning-based knowledge editing is simple and architecture-agnostic, but standard cross-entropy increases the edited target probability without explicitly constraining changes in the non-target output distribution. In sequential editing, such unconstrained redistribution can accumulate as distributional drift and contribute to locality degradation. We propose KLOD, a bounded and distribution-preserving objective for fine-tuning-based knowledge editing that separates the intended target update from distributions that should remain stable. KLOD stops target amplification once a probability threshold is reached, while preserving the target-excluded non-target distribution at target positions and the full next-token distribution at prefix positions. Experiments on CounterFact and ZsRE with Llama3-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct show that KLOD substantially mitigates locality degradation while maintaining high edit reliability. The target probability threshold further provides a controllable Generalization--Locality trade-off. Ablation, multi-seed, and distributional KL analyses support the interpretation that KLOD's locality gains are associated with preserving output distributions rather than simply weakening the edit. Code is available on GitHub https://github.com/Hostoday/KLOD .
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Knowledge Editing
Fine-tuning
Distributional Drift
Locality Degradation
Non-Target Distribution
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

KLOD
distribution-preserving
locality preservation
fine-tuning
knowledge editing