Physics-Constrained Diffusion Reconstruction with Posterior Correction for Quantitative and Fast PET Imaging

📅 2025-08-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Deep learning-based PET reconstruction suffers from quantitative inaccuracy, prominent artifacts, and poor interpretability. Method: We propose a physics-constrained conditional diffusion model that embeds a posterior physical correction mechanism within the diffusion sampling process. The model jointly accounts for scatter, attenuation, and random coincidences, and incorporates time-of-flight (TOF) geometric probability images as conditional inputs, augmented by a GTP-image normalization strategy to enhance physical consistency. Results: Our method achieves quantitative accuracy comparable to fully corrected OSEM on both brain and whole-body PET datasets—outperforming end-to-end deep learning models and, in key metrics, surpassing conventional iterative methods. Reconstruction speed improves by 50–85%. Phantom studies demonstrate superior background uniformity and lesion contrast. Moreover, the approach significantly enhances out-of-distribution generalization and clinical interpretability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Deep learning-based reconstruction of positron emission tomography(PET) data has gained increasing attention in recent years. While these methods achieve fast reconstruction,concerns remain regarding quantitative accuracy and the presence of artifacts,stemming from limited model interpretability,data driven dependence, and overfitting risks.These challenges have hindered clinical adoption.To address them,we propose a conditional diffusion model with posterior physical correction (PET-DPC) for PET image reconstruction. An innovative normalization procedure generates the input Geometric TOF Probabilistic Image (GTP-image),while physical information is incorporated during the diffusion sampling process to perform posterior scatter,attenuation,and random corrections. The model was trained and validated on 300 brain and 50 whole-body PET datasets,a physical phantom,and 20 simulated brain datasets. PET-DPC produced reconstructions closely aligned with fully corrected OSEM images,outperforming end-to-end deep learning models in quantitative metrics and,in some cases, surpassing traditional iterative methods. The model also generalized well to out-of-distribution(OOD) data. Compared to iterative methods,PET-DPC reduced reconstruction time by 50% for brain scans and 85% for whole-body scans. Ablation studies confirmed the critical role of posterior correction in implementing scatter and attenuation corrections,enhancing reconstruction accuracy. Experiments with physical phantoms further demonstrated PET-DPC's ability to preserve background uniformity and accurately reproduce tumor-to-background intensity ratios. Overall,these results highlight PET-DPC as a promising approach for rapid, quantitatively accurate PET reconstruction,with strong potential to improve clinical imaging workflows.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improving quantitative accuracy in PET image reconstruction
Reducing artifacts from deep learning-based PET reconstruction
Accelerating reconstruction time while maintaining image quality
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Conditional diffusion model with posterior physical correction
Generates GTP-image input with innovative normalization
Incorporates physical information during diffusion sampling process
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yucun Hou
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
F
Fenglin Zhan
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, China;Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, No. 1800, Lihu Avenue, Wuxi, 214000, China
C
Chenxi Li
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
Z
Ziquan Yuan
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
H
Haoyu Lu
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia
Y
Yue Chen
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
Y
Yihao Chen
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
Kexin Wang
Kexin Wang
PhD student of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University
MRICEST
R
Runze Liao
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
H
Haoqi Wen
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
G
Ganxi Du
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
J
Jiaru Ni
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
T
Taoran Chen
School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
J
Jinyue Zhang
School of Mathematical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China
J
Jigang Yang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong An Road, Xi Cheng District, Beijing 100050, China
J
Jianyong Jiang
School of Physics and Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China and Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875. China