Technical Report: Facilitating the Adoption of Causal Inference Methods Through LLM-Empowered Co-Pilot

πŸ“… 2025-08-14
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
Estimating treatment effects (TE) from observational data remains challenging due to reliance on strong causal assumptions and complex modeling, limiting accessibility for non-experts. This paper introduces CATE-B: the first end-to-end causal analysis framework powered by LLM-based agents, integrating causal discovery, identification of the minimal uncertainty-adjustment set, structural causal modeling, uncertainty quantification, and adaptive regression model selection. Its key contribution is the formalization of the *minimal uncertainty-adjustment set*β€”a novel criterion balancing confounding control and estimation varianceβ€”and the use of LLMs to assist in causal graph edge orientation and structural inference, substantially lowering the barrier to entry. The system is open-sourced alongside a benchmark suite featuring diverse domains and intricate causal structures. Experiments demonstrate that CATE-B significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both TE estimation accuracy and user success rate, advancing both accessibility and reliability in causal inference.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Estimating treatment effects (TE) from observational data is a critical yet complex task in many fields, from healthcare and economics to public policy. While recent advances in machine learning and causal inference have produced powerful estimation techniques, their adoption remains limited due to the need for deep expertise in causal assumptions, adjustment strategies, and model selection. In this paper, we introduce CATE-B, an open-source co-pilot system that uses large language models (LLMs) within an agentic framework to guide users through the end-to-end process of treatment effect estimation. CATE-B assists in (i) constructing a structural causal model via causal discovery and LLM-based edge orientation, (ii) identifying robust adjustment sets through a novel Minimal Uncertainty Adjustment Set criterion, and (iii) selecting appropriate regression methods tailored to the causal structure and dataset characteristics. To encourage reproducibility and evaluation, we release a suite of benchmark tasks spanning diverse domains and causal complexities. By combining causal inference with intelligent, interactive assistance, CATE-B lowers the barrier to rigorous causal analysis and lays the foundation for a new class of benchmarks in automated treatment effect estimation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Lowering barriers to causal inference adoption for non-experts
Guiding users through end-to-end treatment effect estimation
Simplifying complex causal assumptions and model selection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLM-based causal model construction
Minimal Uncertainty Adjustment Set criterion
Tailored regression method selection
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.