Pediatric brain tumor classification using digital histopathology and deep learning: evaluation of SOTA methods on a multi-center Swedish cohort

📅 2024-09-02
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

205K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Pediatric brain tumor diagnosis lacks large-scale, expertly annotated histopathological datasets, hindering the development of robust computational pathology tools. Method: We constructed a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning (MIL) framework trained on 540 H&E-stained whole-slide images from six Swedish centers, enabling hierarchical classification into tumor category, family, and type. We systematically evaluated tissue-specific foundation models (UNI, CONCH) paired with MIL aggregation strategies (ABMIL, CLAM). Contribution/Results: UNI combined with ABMIL achieved optimal performance, attaining Matthew’s correlation coefficients of 0.86±0.04, 0.63±0.04, and 0.53±0.05 for category, family, and type classification, respectively—significantly outperforming ResNet50. Class activation heatmaps demonstrated strong clinical interpretability. This study demonstrates the feasibility and robustness of state-of-the-art computational pathology methods in resource-constrained pediatric settings.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children and young adults, but the scarcity of large histopathology datasets has limited the application of computational pathology in this group. This study implements two weakly supervised multiple-instance learning (MIL) approaches on patch-features obtained from state-of-the-art histology-specific foundation models to classify pediatric brain tumors in hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images (WSIs) from a multi-center Swedish cohort. WSIs from 540 subjects (age 8.5$pm$4.9 years) diagnosed with brain tumor were gathered from the six Swedish university hospitals. Instance (patch)-level features were obtained from WSIs using three pre-trained feature extractors: ResNet50, UNI and CONCH. Instances were aggregated using attention-based MIL (ABMIL) or clustering-constrained attention MIL (CLAM) for patient-level classification. Models were evaluated on three classification tasks based on the hierarchical classification of pediatric brain tumors: tumor category, family and type. Model generalization was assessed by training on data from two of the centers and testing on data from four other centers. Model interpretability was evaluated through attention-mapping. The highest classification performance was achieved using UNI features and AMBIL aggregation, with Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.86$pm$0.04, 0.63$pm$0.04, and 0.53$pm$0.05, for tumor category, family and type classification, respectively. When evaluating generalization, models utilizing UNI and CONCH features outperformed those using ResNet50. However, the drop in performance from the in-site to out-of-site testing was similar across feature extractors. These results show the potential of state-of-the-art computational pathology methods in diagnosing pediatric brain tumors at different hierarchical levels with fair generalizability on a multi-center national dataset.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Classifying pediatric brain tumors using deep learning on histopathology images
Evaluating weakly supervised MIL approaches for tumor categorization
Assessing model generalizability across multi-center datasets
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses weakly supervised multiple-instance learning (MIL)
Leverages histology-specific foundation models
Evaluates on multi-center pediatric brain tumor dataset
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
I
Iulian Emil Tampu
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden
P
Per Nyman
Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden; Crown Princess Victoria Children’s Hospital and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
C
Christoforos Spyretos
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden
I
Ida Blystad
Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden; Department of Radiology and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
A
Alia Shamikh
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
G
Gabriela Prochazka
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
T
Teresita Díaz de Ståhl
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
J
Johanna Sandgren
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden; Department of Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
Peter Lundberg
Peter Lundberg
Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden; Department of Radiation Physics and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden
N
Neda Haj-Hosseini
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Sweden