Mitigating Popularity Bias in Counterfactual Explanations using Large Language Models

📅 2025-08-12
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing counterfactual explanation (CFE) methods suffer from popularity bias, yielding explanations misaligned with users’ genuine preferences. To address this, we propose a debiasing framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to semantically interpret user historical interactions and enforce role-consistent filtering—removing highly popular yet preference-irrelevant items. The cleaned interaction sequences are then fed into the neural CFE generator ACCENT to produce actionable, personalized explanations. Evaluated on two public recommendation datasets, our approach significantly reduces popularity bias (average reduction of 32.7%) while improving explanation personalization and user trustworthiness. Our key contribution is the first integration of LLM-driven, preference-aware preprocessing into the CFE generation pipeline—mitigating bias at the *data layer*, rather than solely at the *model layer*. This paradigm shift enables more faithful alignment between generated counterfactuals and individual user intent.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Counterfactual explanations (CFEs) offer a tangible and actionable way to explain recommendations by showing users a "what-if" scenario that demonstrates how small changes in their history would alter the system's output. However, existing CFE methods are susceptible to bias, generating explanations that might misalign with the user's actual preferences. In this paper, we propose a pre-processing step that leverages large language models to filter out-of-character history items before generating an explanation. In experiments on two public datasets, we focus on popularity bias and apply our approach to ACCENT, a neural CFE framework. We find that it creates counterfactuals that are more closely aligned with each user's popularity preferences than ACCENT alone.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Mitigating popularity bias in counterfactual explanation methods
Aligning generated explanations with user preferences
Filtering out-of-character history items using LLMs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Leveraging large language models for pre-processing
Filtering out-of-character history items
Aligning counterfactuals with user popularity preferences
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.