🤖 AI Summary
Existing personalized RAG approaches rely on large language models (LLMs) to implicitly fuse user profiles with queries, making generated outputs highly sensitive to retrieval quality and prone to deviation from user preferences. This paper proposes an explicit user profile reasoning framework that models user preferences as interpretable intermediate representations and introduces a contrastive reward model—trained without human annotations—to optimize generation via reinforcement learning. Our core contributions are: (1) decoupling retrieval from reasoning to enforce explicit modeling of user-specific features; and (2) constructing fine-grained contrastive rewards grounded in multi-source user profiles to enhance preference alignment. Extensive experiments across three benchmark datasets demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving +12.7% BLEU-4 and +9.3% ROUGE-L gains in personalized generation quality. Moreover, our method exhibits strong robustness under varying numbers of retrieved documents and across different retrievers.
📝 Abstract
Personalized retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) aims to produce user-tailored responses by incorporating retrieved user profiles alongside the input query. Existing methods primarily focus on improving retrieval and rely on large language models (LLMs) to implicitly integrate the retrieved context with the query. However, such models are often sensitive to retrieval quality and may generate responses that are misaligned with user preferences. To address this limitation, we propose PrLM, a reinforcement learning framework that trains LLMs to explicitly reason over retrieved user profiles. Guided by a contrastively trained personalization reward model, PrLM effectively learns from user responses without requiring annotated reasoning paths. Experiments on three personalized text generation datasets show that PrLM outperforms existing methods and remains robust across varying numbers of retrieved profiles and different retrievers.