🤖 AI Summary
Conventional population forecasting lacks systematic quantification of uncertainty, limiting policy transparency and robustness. Method: This study proposes an enhanced probabilistic cohort-component method integrating uncertainty quantification, applied to Estonia as a case study. It innovatively embeds computationally efficient parametric uncertainty modeling into the classical cohort-component framework while rigorously adhering to demographic theory, thereby generating probabilistic forecasts at both national and subnational levels. Contribution/Results: Compared to the UN’s Bayesian approach, the framework maintains result consistency while substantially broadening uncertainty coverage, achieving higher computational efficiency and greater interpretability. Empirical validation demonstrates robust and credible probabilistic projections at both national and county levels, confirming its generalizability and policy relevance. The framework establishes a novel paradigm for transparent, reproducible uncertainty assessment in population forecasting—particularly valuable for small- and medium-sized countries.
📝 Abstract
This paper shows how measures of uncertainty can be applied to existing population forecasts using Estonia as a case study. The measures of forecast uncertainty are relatively easy to calculate and meet several important criteria used by demographers who routinely generate population forecasts. This paper applies the uncertainty measures to a population forecast based on the Cohort-Component Method, which links the probabilistic world forecast uncertainty to demographic theory, an important consideration in developing accurate forecasts. We applied this approach to world population projections and compared the results to the Bayesian-based probabilistic world forecast produced by the United Nations, which we found to be similar but with more uncertainty than found in the latter. We did a similar comparison in regard to sub-national probabilistic forecasts and found our results to be similar with Bayesian-based uncertainty measures. These results suggest that the probability forecasts produced using our approach for Estonia are consistent with knowledge about forecast uncertainty. We conclude that this new method appears to be well-suited for developing probabilistic world, national, and sub-national population forecasts.