🤖 AI Summary
This work identifies a novel security threat to concept bottleneck models (CBMs) in explainable AI (XAI): concept-level backdoor attacks—where adversaries inject semantically meaningful concept-based triggers to manipulate predictions without degrading clean-sample accuracy. We formally introduce the concept-level backdoor attack paradigm and propose CAT+, a method that optimizes trigger selection via concept–label correlation modeling to jointly achieve high attack success rate (ASR) and strong stealthiness. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CAT+ maintains >98% original accuracy across multiple CBM architectures and datasets while achieving >95% ASR—substantially outperforming conventional input-level backdoor attacks. Our work establishes the first systematic framework for evaluating concept-level vulnerabilities in CBMs, providing both a new research perspective on XAI security and a benchmark tool for robustness assessment.
📝 Abstract
Despite the transformative impact of deep learning across multiple domains, the inherent opacity of these models has driven the development of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Among these efforts, Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have emerged as a key approach to improve interpretability by leveraging high-level semantic information. However, CBMs, like other machine learning models, are susceptible to security threats, particularly backdoor attacks, which can covertly manipulate model behaviors. Understanding that the community has not yet studied the concept level backdoor attack of CBM, because of"Better the devil you know than the devil you don't know.", we introduce CAT (Concept-level Backdoor ATtacks), a methodology that leverages the conceptual representations within CBMs to embed triggers during training, enabling controlled manipulation of model predictions at inference time. An enhanced attack pattern, CAT+, incorporates a correlation function to systematically select the most effective and stealthy concept triggers, thereby optimizing the attack's impact. Our comprehensive evaluation framework assesses both the attack success rate and stealthiness, demonstrating that CAT and CAT+ maintain high performance on clean data while achieving significant targeted effects on backdoored datasets. This work underscores the potential security risks associated with CBMs and provides a robust testing methodology for future security assessments.