Self-Error Adjustment: Theory and Practice of Balancing Individual Performance and Diversity in Ensemble Learning

📅 2025-08-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

213K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Addressing the challenge of jointly optimizing individual accuracy and diversity in ensemble learning, this paper proposes the Self-Error Adjustment (SEA) framework. SEA rigorously decomposes ensemble error into two orthogonal, independently controllable components: “self-error” (capturing base learner performance) and “interaction-error” (quantifying diversity), enabling end-to-end trade-off optimization via tunable parameters in the loss function. Theoretically, SEA yields a tighter generalization error bound and a broader adjustment range than conventional approaches. Methodologically, it is task-agnostic—natively supporting both classification and regression without task-specific architectural modifications. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate that SEA consistently outperforms strong baselines, including NCL. Ablation studies further confirm its fine-grained controllability and training stability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Ensemble learning boosts performance by aggregating predictions from multiple base learners. A core challenge is balancing individual learner accuracy with diversity. Traditional methods like Bagging and Boosting promote diversity through randomness but lack precise control over the accuracy-diversity trade-off. Negative Correlation Learning (NCL) introduces a penalty to manage this trade-off but suffers from loose theoretical bounds and limited adjustment range. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel framework called Self-Error Adjustment (SEA), which decomposes ensemble errors into two distinct components: individual performance terms, representing the self-error of each base learner, and diversity terms, reflecting interactions among learners. This decomposition allows us to introduce an adjustable parameter into the loss function, offering precise control over the contribution of each component, thus enabling finer regulation of ensemble performance. Compared to NCL and its variants, SEA provides a broader range of effective adjustments and more consistent changes in diversity. Furthermore, we establish tighter theoretical bounds for adjustable ensemble methods and validate them through empirical experiments. Experimental results on several public regression and classification datasets demonstrate that SEA consistently outperforms baseline methods across all tasks. Ablation studies confirm that SEA offers more flexible adjustment capabilities and superior performance in fine-tuning strategies.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Balancing individual accuracy and diversity in ensemble learning
Overcoming limitations of traditional methods like Bagging and Boosting
Providing tighter theoretical bounds for adjustable ensemble methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Decomposes ensemble errors into performance and diversity
Introduces adjustable parameter for precise control
Provides tighter theoretical bounds and flexibility
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-10-06arXiv.orgCitations: 0