"Mango Mango, How to Let The Lettuce Dry Without A Spinner?": Exploring User Perceptions of Using An LLM-Based Conversational Assistant Toward Cooking Partner

📅 2023-10-09
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 12
Influential: 1
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates users’ cognitive shift—from perceiving LLM-driven conversational assistants (e.g., Mango Mango) as mere tools to regarding them as “culinary co-partners”—and identifies associated human factors requirements. Using in-situ observation, contextual interviews, and Experience Sampling Method (EMA) in real kitchen settings, the work analyzes both successful and failed interactions to uncover users’ core expectations: spoken-language adaptability, dynamic task planning, and context-aware personalization. It establishes three critical capability dimensions—cross-task information extensibility, real-time situational responsiveness, and heuristic dialogue guidance—and derives six actionable, human-centered design principles for Culinary Assistants (CAs). The findings provide a theoretical framework and practical implementation pathway for LLM-based interactive systems supporting embodied, dynamic, and multimodal everyday tasks.
📝 Abstract
The rapid advancement of the Large Language Model (LLM) has created numerous potentials for integration with conversational assistants (CAs) assisting people in their daily tasks, particularly due to their extensive flexibility. However, users' real-world experiences interacting with these assistants remain unexplored. In this research, we chose cooking, a complex daily task, as a scenario to investigate people's successful and unsatisfactory experiences while receiving assistance from an LLM-based CA, Mango Mango. We discovered that participants value the system's ability to provide extensive information beyond the recipe, offer customized instructions based on context, and assist them in dynamically planning the task. However, they expect the system to be more adaptive to oral conversation and provide more suggestive responses to keep users actively involved. Recognizing that users began treating our LLM-CA as a personal assistant or even a partner rather than just a recipe-reading tool, we propose several design considerations for future development.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Exploring user experiences with LLM-based cooking assistants
Assessing customization and dynamic task planning in CAs
Improving adaptiveness and engagement in conversational assistants
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLM-based conversational assistant for cooking
Customized instructions based on context
Dynamic task planning assistance
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.