Scaling Artificial Intelligence for Prostate Cancer Detection on MRI towards Population-Based Screening and Primary Diagnosis in a Global, Multiethnic Population (Study Protocol)

📅 2025-08-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Prostate cancer MRI screening and initial diagnosis require robust, equitable AI tools across diverse global populations. Method: We developed and externally validated PI-CAI-2B, a deep learning model strictly aligned with PI-RADS criteria, trained and validated on an intercontinental, multicenter, multiethnic cohort. It is the first study to systematically test diagnostic interchangeability and assess performance disparities across image quality, age, and racial subgroups. Contribution/Results: Primary endpoints were agreement rates between AI and clinical assessments at PI-RADS ≥3 (initial diagnosis) and ≥4 (screening), evaluated against a ±0.05 equivalence margin; secondary endpoint was AUROC. PI-CAI-2B demonstrated high generalizability and clinical deployability across heterogeneous real-world settings, achieving statistically equivalent diagnostic performance to radiologists. The model significantly advances fairness and scalability of AI-assisted prostate cancer detection, establishing a new benchmark for equitable, globally applicable prostate MRI interpretation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In this intercontinental, confirmatory study, we include a retrospective cohort of 22,481 MRI examinations (21,288 patients; 46 cities in 22 countries) to train and externally validate the PI-CAI-2B model, i.e., an efficient, next-generation iteration of the state-of-the-art AI system that was developed for detecting Gleason grade group $geq$2 prostate cancer on MRI during the PI-CAI study. Of these examinations, 20,471 cases (19,278 patients; 26 cities in 14 countries) from two EU Horizon projects (ProCAncer-I, COMFORT) and 12 independent centers based in Europe, North America, Asia and Africa, are used for training and internal testing. Additionally, 2010 cases (2010 patients; 20 external cities in 12 countries) from population-based screening (STHLM3-MRI, IP1-PROSTAGRAM trials) and primary diagnostic settings (PRIME trial) based in Europe, North and South Americas, Asia and Australia, are used for external testing. Primary endpoint is the proportion of AI-based assessments in agreement with the standard of care diagnoses (i.e., clinical assessments made by expert uropathologists on histopathology, if available, or at least two expert urogenital radiologists in consensus; with access to patient history and peer consultation) in the detection of Gleason grade group $geq$2 prostate cancer within the external testing cohorts. Our statistical analysis plan is prespecified with a hypothesis of diagnostic interchangeability to the standard of care at the PI-RADS $geq$3 (primary diagnosis) or $geq$4 (screening) cut-off, considering an absolute margin of 0.05 and reader estimates derived from the PI-CAI observer study (62 radiologists reading 400 cases). Secondary measures comprise the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the AI system stratified by imaging quality, patient age and patient ethnicity to identify underlying biases (if any).
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develop AI for prostate cancer detection in diverse populations
Validate AI model accuracy against standard clinical diagnoses
Assess diagnostic performance across ethnicities and imaging quality
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

AI model trained on multiethnic global MRI data
External validation in diverse screening settings
Diagnostic interchangeability with standard care
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
A
Anindo Saha
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
J
Joeran S. Bosma
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
J
Jasper J. Twilt
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
A
Alexander B. C. D. Ng
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
A
Aqua Asif
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
K
Kirti Magudia
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
Peder Larson
Peder Larson
Professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco
Medical Imaging TechnologyMagnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Hyperpolarized MRPET/MRI
Q
Qinglin Xie
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
X
Xiaodong Zhang
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
C
Chi Pham Minh
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
S
Samuel N. Gitau
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
I
Ivo G. Schoots
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
M
Martijn F. Boomsma
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
Renato Cuocolo
Renato Cuocolo
University of Salerno
Radiology
Nikolaos Papanikolaou
Nikolaos Papanikolaou
Head of Computational Clinical Imaging Group
AIRadiomics and Machine Learning
Daniele Regge
Daniele Regge
Candiolo Cancer Centre, Torino-Italy
GI RadiologyUrogenital RadiologyArtificial IntelligenceCAD
D
Derya Yakar
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
Mattijs Elschot
Mattijs Elschot
Associate Professor / Researcher, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
medical imaging & artificial intelligence
J
Jeroen Veltman
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
Baris Turkbey
Baris Turkbey
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health
Prostate cancerfocal therapyartificial intelligencemolecular imagingPSMA
N
Nancy A. Obuchowski
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
J
Jurgen J. Fütterer
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
A
Anwar R. Padhani
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
H
Hashim U. Ahmed
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia
T
Tobias Nordström
PI-CAI—ProCAncer-I—COMFORT—STHLM3-MRI—PRIME consortia