Decoding Scientific Experimental Images: The SPUR Benchmark for Perception, Understanding, and Reasoning

📅 2026-04-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

243K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Current multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have yet to achieve expert-level performance in perceiving, understanding, and reasoning about scientific experimental images, and a systematic evaluation benchmark is lacking. To address this gap, this work introduces SPUR, a novel benchmark comprising 1,084 expert-curated images and 4,264 question-answer pairs, which for the first time enables systematic assessment across three dimensions: fine-grained panel-level perception, cross-panel relational understanding, and expert-level scientific reasoning. Leveraging six categories of image panels and five experimental paradigms, we evaluate 20 representative MLLMs and four multimodal chain-of-thought (MCoT) approaches, revealing a significant performance gap between existing models and human experts in interpreting scientific imagery. These findings highlight a critical bottleneck in AI for Science.
📝 Abstract
We introduce SPUR, a comprehensive benchmark for scientific experimental image perception, understanding, and reasoning, comprising 4,264 question-answering (QA) pairs derived from 1,084 expert-curated images. SPUR features three key innovations: (1) Panel-Level Fine-Grained Perception: evaluating the visual perception of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) across three dimensions (numerical, morphological, and information localization) on six fine-grained panel types; (2) Cross-Panel Relation Understanding: utilizing complex images with an average of 14.3 panels per sample to evaluate MLLMs' ability to decipher intricate cross-panel relations; (3) Expert-Level Reasoning: assessment of qualitative and quantitative reasoning across five experimental paradigms to determine if models can infer conclusions from evidence as human experts do. Comprehensive evaluation of 20 MLLMs and four multimodal Chain-of-Thought (MCoT) methods reveals that current models fall significantly short of the expert-level requirements for scientific image interpretation, underscoring a critical bottleneck in AI for Science (AI4S) research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

scientific experimental images
multimodal large language models
visual perception
cross-panel reasoning
AI for Science
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

fine-grained perception
cross-panel relation understanding
expert-level reasoning
scientific image benchmark
multimodal large language models
🔎 Similar Papers
J
Junpeng Ding
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Z
Zichen Tang
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
H
Haihong E
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
M
Mengyuan Ji
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Yang Liu
Yang Liu
Professor of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
AI Chips and Networks
H
Haolin Tian
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
H
Haiyang Sun
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
P
Pengqi Sun
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Y
Yang Xu
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Y
Yichen Liu
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
H
Haocheng Gao
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Z
Zijie Xi
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
R
Ruomeng Jiang
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
P
Peizhi Zhao
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Rongjin Li
Rongjin Li
Xiamen University, VoiceAI
speaker recognitionspeech enhancementdeep learning
Y
Yuanze Li
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
J
Jiacheng Liu
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Z
Zhongjun Yang
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
J
Jintong Chen
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
S
Siying Lin
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications