🤖 AI Summary
Automated deduction faces a fundamental trade-off between completeness and efficiency, while conventional binary resolution cannot support collaborative reasoning across multiple clauses. Method: This paper proposes Extended Triangular Method (ETM), a generalized multi-clause dynamic inference algorithm grounded in contradiction separation. We formally define the contradiction separation framework—unifying diverse contradiction construction strategies—and introduce a triangular geometric model that enables flexible clause interaction and concurrent derivation. Contribution/Results: ETM overcomes the binary restriction of resolution, substantially enhancing both completeness and computational efficiency in theorem proving. As a core inference engine integrated into several high-performance automated theorem provers, ETM achieves state-of-the-art performance on the TPTP benchmark suite and in the CASC international competition, empirically validating its theoretical novelty and practical applicability.
📝 Abstract
Automated deduction lies at the core of Artificial Intelligence (AI), underpinning theorem proving, formal verification, and logical reasoning. Despite decades of progress, reconciling deductive completeness with computational efficiency remains an enduring challenge. Traditional reasoning calculi, grounded in binary resolution, restrict inference to pairwise clause interactions and thereby limit deductive synergy among multiple clauses. The Contradiction Separation Extension (CSE) framework, introduced in 2018, proposed a dynamic multi-clause reasoning theory that redefined logical inference as a process of contradiction separation rather than sequential resolution. While that work established the theoretical foundation, its algorithmic realization remained unformalized and unpublished. This work presents the Extended Triangular Method (ETM), a generalized contradiction-construction algorithm that formalizes and extends the internal mechanisms of contradiction separation. The ETM unifies multiple contradiction-building strategies, including the earlier Standard Extension method, within a triangular geometric framework that supports flexible clause interaction and dynamic synergy. ETM serves as the algorithmic core of several high-performance theorem provers, CSE, CSE-E, CSI-E, and CSI-Enig, whose competitive results in standard first-order benchmarks (TPTP problem sets and CASC 2018-2015) empirically validate the effectiveness and generality of the proposed approach. By bridging theoretical abstraction and operational implementation, ETM advances the contradiction separation paradigm into a generalized, scalable, and practically competitive model for automated reasoning, offering new directions for future research in logical inference and theorem proving.