IFDECORATOR: Wrapping Instruction Following Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards

📅 2025-08-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
To address the inefficiency and reward hacking issues—such as exploiting validation shortcuts and deviating from users’ true intent—in Reinforcement Learning from Verification Rewards (RLVR) for enhancing LLM instruction-following capability, this paper proposes IntentGuard. Our method comprises three core components: (1) a collaborative adversarial data flywheel that automatically generates progressively challenging instructions; (2) an IntentCheck module that explicitly models and constrains alignment with user intent; and (3) diagnostic “trip-wire” instructions to detect and suppress reward-hacking behaviors in real time. IntentGuard integrates hybrid verifiable rewards, adversarial instruction construction, and intent-aware verification. Evaluated on Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct, it achieves 87.43% accuracy on IFEval—surpassing GPT-4o—and yields significant gains on FollowBench, while substantially reducing reward-hacking incidence.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves instruction following capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but suffers from training inefficiency due to inadequate difficulty assessment. Moreover, RLVR is prone to over-optimization, where LLMs exploit verification shortcuts without aligning to the actual intent of user instructions. We introduce Instruction Following Decorator (IFDecorator}, a framework that wraps RLVR training into a robust and sample-efficient pipeline. It consists of three components: (1) a cooperative-adversarial data flywheel that co-evolves instructions and hybrid verifications, generating progressively more challenging instruction-verification pairs; (2) IntentCheck, a bypass module enforcing intent alignment; and (3) trip wires, a diagnostic mechanism that detects reward hacking via trap instructions, which trigger and capture shortcut exploitation behaviors. Our Qwen2.5-32B-Instruct-IFDecorator achieves 87.43% accuracy on IFEval, outperforming larger proprietary models such as GPT-4o. Additionally, we demonstrate substantial improvements on FollowBench while preserving general capabilities. Our trip wires show significant reductions in reward hacking rates. We will release models, code, and data for future research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improving training efficiency in RLVR for LLMs
Preventing over-optimization and intent misalignment in RLVR
Detecting and reducing reward hacking in instruction following
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Cooperative-adversarial data flywheel for evolving challenges
IntentCheck module ensures instruction intent alignment
Trip wires detect and reduce reward hacking
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
X
Xu Guo
Shanghai AI Laboratory, Shanghai Innovation Institute, Fudan University
Tianyi Liang
Tianyi Liang
PHD, East China Normal University, Shanghai AI Lab,Shanghai Innovation Institute
Multimodal LearningLLMsImage Editing
Tong Jian
Tong Jian
Analog Devices
Machine LearningDeep LearningRF Fingerprinting
X
Xiaogui Yang
Shanghai AI Laboratory
L
Ling-I Wu
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Chenhui Li
Chenhui Li
Baidu
AINLPCV
Z
Zhihui Lu
Fudan University
Qipeng Guo
Qipeng Guo
Fudan University
K
Kai Chen
Shanghai AI Laboratory