๐ค AI Summary
This study addresses the frequent conflation of anthropomorphism and anthropomimesis in human-robot interaction (HRI) research, which obscures design accountability and attribution mechanisms. It systematically distinguishes these concepts for the first time: anthropomorphism refers to usersโ subjective perception that a robot possesses human-like traits, representing a receiver-side phenomenon, whereas anthropomimesis denotes designersโ intentional endowment of robots with human characteristics, constituting a design-side practice. Through conceptual analysis and theoretical modeling grounded in social robotics and HRI theory, the work clarifies the distinct roles of perceivers and designers in the attribution of human traits. The resulting definitional framework offers a foundational contribution to HRI theory, robot design, and evaluation methodologies.
๐ Abstract
In this preliminary work, we offer an initial disambiguation of the theoretical concepts anthropomorphism and anthropomimesis in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) and social robotics. We define anthropomorphism as users perceiving human-like qualities in robots, and anthropomimesis as robot developers designing human-like features into robots. This contribution aims to provide a clarification and exploration of these concepts for future HRI scholarship, particularly regarding the party responsible for human-like qualities - robot perceiver for anthropomorphism, and robot designer for anthropomimesis. We provide this contribution so that researchers can build on these disambiguated theoretical concepts for future robot design and evaluation.