iSMC: A BDD-based Symbolic Model Checker with Interactive Certification

📅 2026-05-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

187K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of efficient and trustworthy verification mechanisms for CTL model checking with fairness constraints by presenting the first self-certifying symbolic model checker that supports interactive certification. The approach leverages Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs) to perform symbolic verification of CTL properties and introduces, for the first time, an interactive proof system that formally certifies verification results with user-configurable high confidence after solving. By integrating CTL semantics with fairness constraints, QBF solving techniques, and interactive certification, this method preserves full CTL model checking capabilities while delivering a reliable and verifiable automated verification guarantee.
📝 Abstract
We present iSMC, the first self-certifying model checker with interactive certification, a certification paradigm based on the theory of interactive proof systems. iSMC is a symbolic BDD-based model checker for arbitrary properties of Computation Tree Logic (CTL) with justice requirements. After solving an instance of the model-checking problem, iSMC conducts a certification procedure that guarantees with high probability (chosen by the user) that the answer is correct. iSMC is based on the technology of the QBF-solver with interactive certification presented by Couillard et al. at CAV 2023. We extend, improve on, and re-implement this technology, adapting it to the needs of CTL model checking.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

symbolic model checking
interactive certification
Computation Tree Logic
BDD
correctness guarantee
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

interactive certification
self-certifying model checking
BDD-based symbolic model checking
Computation Tree Logic (CTL)
justice requirements
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.