🤖 AI Summary
This study systematically evaluates the strategic decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in board games grounded in game-theoretic principles. Method: We introduce the first LLM evaluation framework tailored for game-theoretic scenarios, integrated with OpenSpiel to support diverse zero-sum and non-zero-sum games. We conduct multi-dimensional comparisons between LLM agents, random policies, human players, and reinforcement learning agents. Our pipeline combines LiteLLM API abstraction with vLLM-based local inference, leverages Ray for distributed execution, and incorporates a novel interpretable reasoning trace analyzer. Contribution/Results: We provide the first empirical assessment of LLMs’ strategic rationality, counterfactual reasoning, and equilibrium-seeking behavior under rigorous game-theoretic conditions. Our findings reveal both strengths and fundamental limitations of LLMs in complex strategic interactions, establishing a foundational theoretical basis and benchmark for their trustworthy deployment in high-stakes, higher-order decision-making tasks.
📝 Abstract
The Board Game Arena library provides a framework for evaluating the decision making abilities of large language models (LLMs) through strategic board games implemented in Google OpenSpiel library. The framework enables systematic comparisons between LLM based agents and other agents (random, human, reinforcement learning agents, etc.) in various game scenarios by wrapping multiple board and matrix games and supporting different agent types. It integrates API access to models via LiteLLM, local model deployment via vLLM, and offers distributed execution through Ray. Additionally it provides extensive analysis tools for the LLM reasoning traces. This paper summarizes the structure, key characteristics, and motivation of the repository, highlighting how it contributes to the empirical evaluation of the reasoning of LLM and game-theoretic behavior