Hide and Seek with LLMs: An Adversarial Game for Sneaky Error Generation and Self-Improving Diagnosis

📅 2025-08-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

162K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit limited capability in diagnosing deep, subtle errors—particularly in mathematical reasoning—due to training objectives prioritizing correct outputs over explicit exposure to and learning from complex, concealed mistakes. To address this, we propose HSG, an adversarial framework featuring co-evolving Sneaky (stealthy error generation) and Diagnosis (adaptive error identification) agents. HSG dynamically synthesizes highly deceptive errors via reasoning-chain perturbation, inter-LLM adversarial interaction, and self-feedback learning, while simultaneously strengthening diagnostic robustness. Evaluated on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks, HSG achieves a 16.8%–31.4% absolute improvement in diagnosis accuracy over GPT-4o, significantly enhancing fine-grained error understanding and localization. Furthermore, we release the first high-quality, expert-annotated mathematical diagnosis dataset containing stealthy, semantically plausible erroneous reasoning traces.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in reasoning and generation across domains, but still struggle with identifying and diagnosing complex errors. This stems mainly from training objectives that prioritize correct answers, limiting exposure to and learning from errors. While recent studies have begun to address this by introducing error signals, most rely on shallow, static errors, restricting improvement in deep diagnostic ability. To overcome this, we propose Hide and Seek Game (HSG), a dynamic adversarial framework for error generation and diagnosis, and evaluate it on mathematical problem-solving. HSG involves two adversarial roles: Sneaky, which "hides" by generating subtle, deceptive reasoning errors, and Diagnosis, which "seeks" to accurately detect them. Through adversarial co-evolution, both error stealth and diagnostic precision are enhanced. Experiments on several math reasoning tasks show that HSG significantly boosts error diagnosis, achieving 16.8%--31.4% higher accuracy than baselines like GPT-4o. We also release a challenging dataset of deceptive errors and diagnostic annotations as a benchmark for future research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

LLMs struggle with identifying complex reasoning errors
Training lacks exposure to subtle, deceptive errors
Need dynamic adversarial framework for error diagnosis
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Adversarial framework for error generation
Dynamic co-evolution of error stealth
Boosts diagnostic precision significantly
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-10-03International Conference on Learning RepresentationsCitations: 28
Rui Zou
Rui Zou
Postdoctoral Associate, Cornell University
High Energy Physics
M
Mengqi Wei
Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University
Y
Yutao Zhu
Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China
J
Jirong Wen
Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China
X
Xin Zhao
Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China
J
Jing Chen
School of Information and Security Engineering, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law