๐ค AI Summary
This work addresses image reconstruction and uncertainty quantification in compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging by formulating reconstruction as a linear inverse problem within a Bayesian framework, assuming image sparsity in either the total variation or wavelet domain. The authors propose a novel integration of split-augmented Gibbs sampling with proximal Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to efficiently draw samples from the posterior distribution. Notably, the method operates without reliance on deep learning, accommodates arbitrary sparsifying bases and multi-coil data, and achieves superior reconstruction quality compared to conventional optimization-based approaches across various k-space undersampling patterns. Moreover, the resulting uncertainty maps exhibit strong correlation with true reconstruction errors, significantly outperforming existing deep learningโbased methods in uncertainty estimation fidelity.
๐ Abstract
We propose a novel framework for uncertainty quantification using compressed sensing magnetic resonance image reconstruction. The problem is formulated within a Bayesian framework as a linear inverse problem, with prior distributions assigned to the unknown model parameters. Specifically, the image to be reconstructed is assumed to be sparse in a given basis. We develop a general framework applicable to any basis and as examples, we test the sparsity of the image in its (1) spatial gradients using a total variation prior model, and in its (2) wavelet transform. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, based on a split-and-augmented Gibbs sampler, is then employed to sample from the posterior distribution of the unknown parameters. The non-differentiable conditional distributions are efficiently sampled using a proximal MCMC method. The proposed algorithms are validated on both single-coil and multi-coil datasets using various k-space sub-sampling patterns and ratios. The results demonstrate the superior performance of each proposed approach in reconstructing images compared to its counterpart optimisation-based method. Moreover, our framework effectively quantifies uncertainty, showing a notable correlation between estimated uncertainty maps and error maps computed using ground truth and reconstructed images, compared with existing deep learning-based methods.