Generative AI as a Geopolitical Factor in Industry 5.0: Sovereignty, Access, and Control

📅 2025-08-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper examines the escalating geopolitical dimensions of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) within the Industrial 5.0 paradigm, highlighting its role as a strategic national asset that exacerbates global inequities in talent, computational capacity, and data resources; drives digital fragmentation; challenges human-centric collaboration principles; and raises critical governance concerns regarding control, dual-use risks, and algorithmic accountability. Method: We develop an integrated analytical framework spanning technological, economic, and ethical dimensions, employing geopolitical analysis, assessments of compute and data sovereignty, and cross-national policy comparison to systematically evaluate GenAI’s structural impacts on national sovereignty, supply chain resilience, and global governance. Contribution/Results: The study proposes a “resilience–ethics” dual-track governance paradigm, advocating simultaneous safeguarding of technological sovereignty and strengthening of multilateral coordination mechanisms to ensure responsible, inclusive, and secure GenAI development aligned with Industrial 5.0 values.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Industry 5.0 marks a new phase in industrial evolution, emphasizing human-centricity, sustainability, and resilience through the integration of advanced technologies. Within this evolving landscape, Generative AI (GenAI) and autonomous systems are not only transforming industrial processes but also emerging as pivotal geopolitical instruments. We examine strategic implications of GenAI in Industry 5.0, arguing that these technologies have become national assets central to sovereignty, access, and global influence. As countries compete for AI supremacy, growing disparities in talent, computational infrastructure, and data access are reshaping global power hierarchies and accelerating the fragmentation of the digital economy. The human-centric ethos of Industry 5.0, anchored in collaboration between humans and intelligent systems, increasingly conflicts with the autonomy and opacity of GenAI, raising urgent governance challenges related to meaningful human control, dual-use risks, and accountability. We analyze how these dynamics influence defense strategies, industrial competitiveness, and supply chain resilience, including the geopolitical weaponization of export controls and the rise of data sovereignty. Our contribution synthesizes technological, economic, and ethical perspectives to propose a comprehensive framework for navigating the intersection of GenAI and geopolitics. We call for governance models that balance national autonomy with international coordination while safeguarding human-centric values in an increasingly AI-driven world.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Examining GenAI's geopolitical role in Industry 5.0 sovereignty and control
Addressing global power disparities in AI talent and infrastructure
Balancing human-centric values with GenAI autonomy and governance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Generative AI as geopolitical tool
Human-centric Industry 5.0 integration
Governance balancing autonomy and coordination
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.