Proactive Constrained Policy Optimization with Preemptive Penalty

📅 2025-08-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Safety-constrained reinforcement learning often suffers from constraint violations and training instability. To address this, we propose Proactive Constraint Policy Optimization (PCPO), which introduces a predictive penalty mechanism that imposes costs before the policy approaches safety boundaries, and a boundary-aware intrinsic reward to guide safe exploration. Theoretically, we establish—for the first time—upper and lower bounds linking the duality gap to policy update performance, thereby guaranteeing convergence and stability. Methodologically, PCPO unifies Lagrangian relaxation, barrier functions, intrinsic rewards, and policy iteration into an end-to-end, safety-driven optimization framework. Experiments demonstrate that, compared to existing post-hoc correction methods, PCPO significantly reduces constraint violation rates while improving robustness and convergence stability across diverse safety-critical benchmarks.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Safe Reinforcement Learning (RL) often faces significant issues such as constraint violations and instability, necessitating the use of constrained policy optimization, which seeks optimal policies while ensuring adherence to specific constraints like safety. Typically, constrained optimization problems are addressed by the Lagrangian method, a post-violation remedial approach that may result in oscillations and overshoots. Motivated by this, we propose a novel method named Proactive Constrained Policy Optimization (PCPO) that incorporates a preemptive penalty mechanism. This mechanism integrates barrier items into the objective function as the policy nears the boundary, imposing a cost. Meanwhile, we introduce a constraint-aware intrinsic reward to guide boundary-aware exploration, which is activated only when the policy approaches the constraint boundary. We establish theoretical upper and lower bounds for the duality gap and the performance of the PCPO update, shedding light on the method's convergence characteristics. Additionally, to enhance the optimization performance, we adopt a policy iteration approach. An interesting finding is that PCPO demonstrates significant stability in experiments. Experimental results indicate that the PCPO framework provides a robust solution for policy optimization under constraints, with important implications for future research and practical applications.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addresses constraint violations in Safe Reinforcement Learning
Proposes proactive penalty to prevent oscillations and overshoots
Ensures policy optimization with boundary-aware exploration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proactive penalty mechanism with barrier items
Constraint-aware intrinsic reward for exploration
Policy iteration for enhanced optimization performance
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
N
Ning Yang
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
P
Pengyu Wang
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Guoqing Liu
Guoqing Liu
Microsoft Research AI for Science
Artificial IntelligenceReinforcement LearningLarge Language ModelsAI for Science
H
Haifeng Zhang
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
P
Pin Lyu
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences
J
Jun Wang
University of Science and Technology Beijing