PHM-Bench: A Domain-Specific Benchmarking Framework for Systematic Evaluation of Large Models in Prognostics and Health Management

📅 2025-08-04
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current large language model (LLM) evaluation frameworks in the field of Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) suffer from structural fragmentation, unidimensional assessment, and coarse-grained metrics, hindering their engineering deployment. To address this, we propose PHM-Bench—the first three-dimensional, PHM-specific evaluation framework—structured along three orthogonal dimensions: foundational capabilities, core PHM tasks, and full-lifecycle applicability. We introduce three fine-grained, task-relevant metrics: knowledge comprehension, algorithm generation, and task optimization. PHM-Bench integrates curated industrial case studies and public PHM datasets to enable multi-scenario empirical evaluation. It is the first framework to provide unified, comparable, and interpretable assessment across canonical PHM tasks—including condition monitoring, fault diagnosis, and remaining useful life prediction. By establishing a standardized benchmark and methodological foundation, PHM-Bench bridges the gap between general-purpose LLMs and domain-specialized PHM models.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted in industrial domains, offering new opportunities for Prognostics and Health Management (PHM). These models help address challenges such as high development costs, long deployment cycles, and limited generalizability. However, despite the growing synergy between PHM and LLMs, existing evaluation methodologies often fall short in structural completeness, dimensional comprehensiveness, and evaluation granularity. This hampers the in-depth integration of LLMs into the PHM domain. To address these limitations, this study proposes PHM-Bench, a novel three-dimensional evaluation framework for PHM-oriented large models. Grounded in the triadic structure of fundamental capability, core task, and entire lifecycle, PHM-Bench is tailored to the unique demands of PHM system engineering. It defines multi-level evaluation metrics spanning knowledge comprehension, algorithmic generation, and task optimization. These metrics align with typical PHM tasks, including condition monitoring, fault diagnosis, RUL prediction, and maintenance decision-making. Utilizing both curated case sets and publicly available industrial datasets, our study enables multi-dimensional evaluation of general-purpose and domain-specific models across diverse PHM tasks. PHM-Bench establishes a methodological foundation for large-scale assessment of LLMs in PHM and offers a critical benchmark to guide the transition from general-purpose to PHM-specialized models.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluate LLMs in PHM lacking structural completeness and granularity
Develop PHM-Bench for multi-dimensional model assessment in PHM tasks
Bridge gap from general-purpose to PHM-specialized LLM evaluation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Three-dimensional evaluation framework for PHM
Multi-level metrics for PHM tasks
Case sets and datasets for model assessment
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
P
Puyu Yang
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China; Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
L
Laifa Tao
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China; Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
Zijian Huang
Zijian Huang
ECE PhD Candidate, University of Michigan
LLM/VLMSecurityRLMR
H
Haifei Liu
Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
W
Wenyan Cao
Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
H
Hao Ji
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China
J
Jianan Qiu
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China
Q
Qixuan Huang
Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
X
Xuanyuan Su
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China
Yuhang Xie
Yuhang Xie
Peking University
J
Jun Zhang
Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
S
Shangyu Li
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China; Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
C
Chen Lu
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China; Institute of Reliability Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China; Science & Technology on Reliability & Environmental Engineering Laboratory, Beijing, China; School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China
Z
Zhixuan Lian
Hangzhou International Innovation Institute, Beihang University, China