Asymptotically Optimal Inapproximability of E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration

📅 2025-07-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies the Maxmin E$k$-SAT reconfiguration problem: given two satisfying assignments of a $k$-CNF formula, transform one into the other via a sequence of single-variable flips, maximizing the minimum fraction of satisfied clauses at any step. We establish the first tight approximation hardness bound of $1 - Theta(1/k)$, strictly worse than the classical Max E$k$-SAT bound—highlighting the intrinsic non-monotonicity challenge unique to reconfiguration. To overcome the dynamic evolution of constraints along reconfiguration paths, we introduce a novel non-monotonicity testing framework. We design a deterministic approximation algorithm achieving a factor of $1 - frac{1}{k-1} - frac{1}{k}$, and prove that for sufficiently large $k$, no algorithm can achieve better than $1 - frac{1}{10k}$. Our results reveal the fundamental computational difficulty of optimization in reconfiguration settings and provide the first tight approximation bounds for any PSPACE-hard reconfiguration problem.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In the Maxmin E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration problem, we are given a satisfiable $k$-CNF formula $varphi$ where each clause contains exactly $k$ literals, along with a pair of its satisfying assignments. The objective is transform one satisfying assignment into the other by repeatedly flipping the value of a single variable, while maximizing the minimum fraction of satisfied clauses of $varphi$ throughout the transformation. In this paper, we demonstrate that the optimal approximation factor for Maxmin E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration is $1 - Θleft(frac{1}{k} ight)$. On the algorithmic side, we develop a deterministic $left(1-frac{1}{k-1}-frac{1}{k} ight)$-factor approximation algorithm for every $k geq 3$. On the hardness side, we show that it is $mathsf{PSPACE}$-hard to approximate this problem within a factor of $1-frac{1}{10k}$ for every sufficiently large $k$. Note that an ``$mathsf{NP}$ analogue'' of Maxmin E$k$-SAT Reconfiguration is Max E$k$-SAT, whose approximation threshold is $1-frac{1}{2^k}$ shown by Håstad (JACM 2001). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reconfiguration problem whose approximation threshold is (asymptotically) worse than that of its $mathsf{NP}$ analogue. To prove the hardness result, we introduce a new ``non-monotone'' test, which is specially tailored to reconfiguration problems, despite not being helpful in the PCP regime.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Determine optimal approximation for Maxmin Ek-SAT Reconfiguration.
Develop deterministic approximation algorithm for Ek-SAT Reconfiguration.
Prove PSPACE-hardness of approximating Ek-SAT Reconfiguration.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Deterministic approximation algorithm for Maxmin E$k$-SAT
PSPACE-hardness proof via non-monotone test
Asymptotic inapproximability threshold analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Shuichi Hirahara
National Institute of Informatics, Japan
Naoto Ohsaka
Naoto Ohsaka
CyberAgent, Inc.
Theoretical Computer Sciencenaoto.ohsaka@gmail.com