Active IRS-Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communications with Extended Targets

📅 2025-08-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In non-line-of-sight (NLoS) scenarios, integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems suffer from severe path loss when simultaneously serving extended-target sensing and multi-user communications. Method: This paper proposes an active intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-assisted ISAC architecture. A non-convex joint design framework is formulated under signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) constraints, jointly optimizing base station beamforming and the active IRS’s amplification-reflection coefficients. The Cramér–Rao lower bound (CRLB) for extended-target parameter estimation is theoretically derived, revealing the fundamental trade-off between transmit power and IRS amplification gain; we rigorously prove that maximizing the amplification gain is optimal. Results: The proposed alternating optimization algorithm significantly reduces sensing error while guaranteeing communication quality, achieving simultaneous gains in both communication rate and sensing accuracy compared to passive IRS-assisted ISAC systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This paper studies the active intelligent reflecting surface (IRS)-enabled integrated sensing and communications (ISAC), in which an active IRS is deployed to assist the base station (BS) in serving multiple communication users (CUs) and simultaneously sensing an emph{extended} target at the non-line-of-sight (NLoS) area of the BS. The active IRS has the capability of amplifying the reflected signals so as to overcome significant reflection path loss in NLoS communication and sensing. In particular, we derive the sensing Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) for estimating the target response matrix. Accordingly, we jointly optimize the transmit beamforming at the BS and the reflective beamforming at the active IRS to minimize the sensing CRB, subject to the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) requirements at the CUs, the transmit power budgets at the BS and active IRS, as well as the power amplification gain constraints at the active IRS. The CRB minimization problem is highly non-convex and thus difficult to solve in general. To address this challenge, we first focus on two specified conditions by considering the sensing-only scenario via ignoring the SINR constraints for communications, for which the closed-form optimal transmit beamforming is derived. Then, we propose two efficient alternating optimization (AO)-based algorithms to obtain high-quality solutions for the general ISAC scenarios. Next, we analyze the inherent relationship between the power scaling at the BS and the amplification scaling at the active IRS. It is shown that the active IRS always amplifies the signal using the maximum amplification gain under practical system settings. Finally, numerical results are provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed AO-based algorithms and the benefits of active IRS-enabled ISAC compared to its passive IRSs counterparts.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Active IRS enhances NLoS ISAC for extended targets
Joint optimization of BS and IRS beamforming to minimize CRB
Analyzing power scaling and amplification gains in active IRS systems
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Active IRS amplifies signals for NLoS ISAC
Joint optimization of BS and IRS beamforming
AO-based algorithms solve non-convex CRB problem
🔎 Similar Papers
Y
Yuan Fang
Purple Mountain Laboratories, Nanjing 211111, China, and the Department of Electrical Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Xianxin Song
Xianxin Song
City University of Hong Kong
Integrated sensing and communicationIntelligent Reflecting Surface
H
Huazhou Hou
Purple Mountain Laboratories, Nanjing 211111, China
Ziguo Zhong
Ziguo Zhong
Purple Mountain Laboratories, Nanjing 211111, China
Xianghao Yu
Xianghao Yu
Assistant Professor, City University of Hong Kong
Wireless CommunicationsSignal Processing
J
Jie Xu
School of Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Future Network of Intelligence Institute (FNii-Shenzhen), and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Future Networks of Intelligence, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China
Yongming Huang
Yongming Huang
Professor of Information and Communications Engineering, Southeast University, China
Wireless CommunicationsSignal Processing