🤖 AI Summary
Existing continuous chain-of-thought (CCoT) methods improve reasoning efficiency but suffer from inaccurate alignment, objective inconsistency, and limited capability on complex problems. To address these issues, this paper proposes SynAdapt—a novel framework comprising three key components: (1) a synthetic CCoT generation mechanism that directly constructs high-quality, differentiable alignment targets; (2) a difficulty classifier jointly modeling CCoT representations and contextual features to dynamically trigger adaptive rethinking; and (3) a hybrid training strategy integrating discrete CoT distillation with end-to-end fine-tuning for efficient optimization. Evaluated across multi-level reasoning benchmarks, SynAdapt consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CoT and CCoT baselines, achieving superior accuracy–efficiency trade-offs. Ablation studies and cross-dataset experiments further validate its effective alignment, strong generalization, and practical applicability.
📝 Abstract
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves model performance, it incurs significant time costs due to the generation of discrete CoT tokens (DCoT). Continuous CoT (CCoT) offers a more efficient alternative, but existing CCoT methods are hampered by indirect fine-tuning, limited alignment, or inconsistent targets. To overcome these limitations, we propose extit{SynAdapt}, an innovative efficient reasoning framework. Specifically, extit{SynAdapt} generates the synthetic CCoT to serve as a precise and effective alignment target for LLMs. This synthetic CCoT explicitly guides the LLM to learn CCoT and derive accurate answers directly. Furthermore, relying solely on CCoT is insufficient for solving hard questions. To address this, extit{SynAdapt} integrates a difficulty classifier that leverages both question context and CCoT to identify hard questions. CCoT can effectively help identify hard questions after some brief reasoning. We then adaptively prompt the LLM to re-think these hard questions for improved performance. Extensive experimental results across various benchmarks from different difficulty levels strongly demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, achieving the best accuracy-efficiency trade-off.