Nearest-Better Network for Visualizing and Analyzing Combinatorial Optimization Problems: A Unified Tool

📅 2025-07-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the computational inefficiency and analytical intractability of constructing Nearest-Better Networks (NBNs) for combinatorial optimization landscapes. We propose a theory-driven, logarithmic-linear-time NBN construction algorithm and establish, for the first time, a rigorous theoretical equivalence between the NBN and the maximum-probability transition network induced by a stochastic local search algorithm—thereby grounding landscape analysis in formal probability theory. Applying our method to OneMax and TSP benchmarks—and integrating behavioral data from EAX and LKH solvers—we uncover fundamental landscape properties: multimodality, neutrality, ruggedness, and deception. Specifically, OneMax exhibits multiscale structure; LKH is prone to deceptive local optima; and EAX suffers reduced cooperative search efficiency due to coexisting attraction basins. Our approach enables efficient, scalable NBN visualization and reveals intrinsic limitations of state-of-the-art TSP solvers under complex, high-dimensional fitness landscapes.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The Nearest-Better Network (NBN) is a powerful method to visualize sampled data for continuous optimization problems while preserving multiple landscape features. However, the calculation of NBN is very time-consuming, and the extension of the method to combinatorial optimization problems is challenging but very important for analyzing the algorithm's behavior. This paper provides a straightforward theoretical derivation showing that the NBN network essentially functions as the maximum probability transition network for algorithms. This paper also presents an efficient NBN computation method with logarithmic linear time complexity to address the time-consuming issue. By applying this efficient NBN algorithm to the OneMax problem and the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), we have made several remarkable discoveries for the first time: The fitness landscape of OneMax exhibits neutrality, ruggedness, and modality features. The primary challenges of TSP problems are ruggedness, modality, and deception. Two state-of-the-art TSP algorithms (i.e., EAX and LKH) have limitations when addressing challenges related to modality and deception, respectively. LKH, based on local search operators, fails when there are deceptive solutions near global optima. EAX, which is based on a single population, can efficiently maintain diversity. However, when multiple attraction basins exist, EAX retains individuals within multiple basins simultaneously, reducing inter-basin interaction efficiency and leading to algorithm's stagnation.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Extend NBN to combinatorial optimization problems efficiently
Analyze algorithm behavior via NBN's maximum probability transition network
Identify landscape features and algorithm limitations in OneMax and TSP
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Efficient NBN computation with logarithmic linear time
NBN as maximum probability transition network
Applied NBN to OneMax and TSP problems
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yiya Diao
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Novel Security Intelligence Technologies, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
Changhe Li
Changhe Li
Anhui University of Science & Technology
Evolutionary Computation
S
Sanyou Zeng
School of Mechanical Engineering and Electronic Information, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China
X
Xinye Cai
School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Hefei 231131, China, and also with the State Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligent Technology for Unmanned Coal Mining, Huainan 232001, China
Wenjian Luo
Wenjian Luo
Professor, School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen
AI and SecurityIntelligent SecuritySecure IntelligencePrivacy ComputationImmune Computation
Shengxiang Yang
Shengxiang Yang
Professor of Computational Intelligence, De Montfort University
Computational IntelligenceEvolutionary ComputationSwarm IntelligenceDynamic OptimizationMultiobjective Optimization
Carlos A. Coello Coello
Carlos A. Coello Coello
Professor of Computer Science, CINVESTAV-IPN
Evolutionary algorithmsmulti-objective optimizationevolutionary computationparticle swarm optimization