🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates whether large language model (LLM)-driven multi-agent systems can replicate core human social dynamics—conformity, group polarization, and community fragmentation—observed in online forums. Method: We employ a structured multi-agent simulation framework to systematically evaluate LLMs of varying parameter scales and reasoning capabilities (e.g., chain-of-thought prompting, self-consistency) on social influence tasks. Contribution/Results: We find that smaller-scale models exhibit stronger conformity under peer influence, whereas reasoning-optimized models demonstrate significantly greater belief stability and resistance to polarization. Critically, we provide the first quantitative evidence of a negative correlation between LLM cognitive capacity and susceptibility to social influence effects. These findings establish a reproducible methodological foundation and empirical basis for AI-augmented, controlled experiments in computational social science.
📝 Abstract
Recent advancements in Large Language Models offer promising capabilities to simulate complex human social interactions. We investigate whether LLM-based multi-agent simulations can reproduce core human social dynamics observed in online forums. We evaluate conformity dynamics, group polarization, and fragmentation across different model scales and reasoning capabilities using a structured simulation framework. Our findings indicate that smaller models exhibit higher conformity rates, whereas models optimized for reasoning are more resistant to social influence.